[PATCH] ARM: dts: armada-38x: label USB and SATA nodes

[PATCH] ARM: dts: armada-38x: label USB and SATA nodes

[Ralph Sennhauser]

Recently most nodes got labels to make them referenceable. The USB 3.0
nodes as well as the nodes for the SATA controllers were left out,
rectify the omission.

Signed-off-by: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---

Hi everybody

In preparation to add support for the Linksys WRT3200ACM (Rango) some
rework of the "dts-stack" is highly desirable. This patch is part of the
preparatory work but independent.

The label for the USB 2.0 port is "usb0:", so using "usb1:" and "usb2:"
would be the logical continuation. Guess you realized the catch already,
"usb2:" for an USB 3.0 controller might be very confusing.

I'm sending this patch ahead of the rest so the labels can be discussed
and finalized.

Ralph

---

 arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-38x.dtsi | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-38x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-38x.dtsi
index ba27ec1..78c838a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-38x.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-38x.dtsi
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@
 				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 21 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 			};
 
-			sata@a8000 {
+			satac0: sata@a8000 {
 				compatible = "marvell,armada-380-ahci";
 				reg = <0xa8000 0x2000>;
 				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@
 				status = "disabled";
 			};
 
-			sata@e0000 {
+			satac1: sata@e0000 {
 				compatible = "marvell,armada-380-ahci";
 				reg = <0xe0000 0x2000>;
 				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@
 				status = "disabled";
 			};
 
-			usb3@f0000 {
+			usb3_0: usb3@f0000 {
 				compatible = "marvell,armada-380-xhci";
 				reg = <0xf0000 0x4000>,<0xf4000 0x4000>;
 				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@
 				status = "disabled";
 			};
 
-			usb3@f8000 {
+			usb3_1: usb3@f8000 {
 				compatible = "marvell,armada-380-xhci";
 				reg = <0xf8000 0x4000>,<0xfc000 0x4000>;
 				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
-- 
2.10.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: armada-38x: label USB and SATA nodes

[Andrew Lunn]

> -			sata@a8000 {
> +			satac0: sata@a8000 {

Hi Ralph

Why the c in satac0?

>  
> -			usb3@f0000 {
> +			usb3_0: usb3@f0000 {
>  				compatible = "marvell,armada-380-xhci";
>  				reg = <0xf0000 0x4000>,<0xf4000 0x4000>;
>  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@
>  				status = "disabled";
>  			};
>  
> -			usb3@f8000 {
> +			usb3_1: usb3@f8000 {
>  				compatible = "marvell,armada-380-xhci";
>  				reg = <0xf8000 0x4000>,<0xfc000 0x4000>;
>  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

I can understand what you are saying. But does anybody else care? Are
there other .dtsi files differentiating between USB 1.1, 2 and 3?

      Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: armada-38x: label USB and SATA nodes

[Ralph Sennhauser]

On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:50:15 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> > -			sata@a8000 {
> > +			satac0: sata@a8000 {  
> 
> Hi Ralph
> 
> Why the c in satac0?

For controller and to not conflict with a use case of sata0 for a port,
similarly to pciec and pcie1. See armada-385-synology-ds116.dts.

> 
> >  
> > -			usb3@f0000 {
> > +			usb3_0: usb3@f0000 {
> >  				compatible =
> > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf0000 0x4000>,<0xf4000 0x4000>;
> >  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16
> > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@
> >  				status = "disabled";
> >  			};
> >  
> > -			usb3@f8000 {
> > +			usb3_1: usb3@f8000 {
> >  				compatible =
> > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf8000 0x4000>,<0xfc000 0x4000>;
> >  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17
> > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;  
> 
> I can understand what you are saying. But does anybody else care? Are
> there other .dtsi files differentiating between USB 1.1, 2 and 3?

It's handled differently where ever I looked, some do some don't. A
case for distinguishing USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 like this is
armada-388-gp.dts.

Personally I'm only interested in there being a label, making it
"natural" is a bonus though.

Thanks
Ralph

> 
>       Andrew

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: armada-38x: label USB and SATA nodes

[Andrew Lunn]

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:39:20PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:50:15 +0200
> Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > > -			sata@a8000 {
> > > +			satac0: sata@a8000 {  
> > 
> > Hi Ralph
> > 
> > Why the c in satac0?
> 
> For controller and to not conflict with a use case of sata0 for a port,
> similarly to pciec and pcie1. See armada-385-synology-ds116.dts.

:~/linux/arch/arm/boot/dts$ ls *ds116*
ls: cannot access '*ds116*': No such file or directory

But anyway, a few boards seem to solve this by calling the controller
node ahci0: and the port sata0:

> > > -			usb3@f0000 {
> > > +			usb3_0: usb3@f0000 {
> > >  				compatible =
> > > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf0000 0x4000>,<0xf4000 0x4000>;
> > >  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@
> > >  				status = "disabled";
> > >  			};
> > >  
> > > -			usb3@f8000 {
> > > +			usb3_1: usb3@f8000 {
> > >  				compatible =
> > > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf8000 0x4000>,<0xfc000 0x4000>;
> > >  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;  
> > 
> > I can understand what you are saying. But does anybody else care? Are
> > there other .dtsi files differentiating between USB 1.1, 2 and 3?
> 
> It's handled differently where ever I looked, some do some don't. A
> case for distinguishing USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 like this is
> armada-388-gp.dts.

Humm...

                        /* CON4 */
                        usb@58000 {
                                vcc-supply = <&reg_usb2_0_vbus>;
                                status = "okay";
                        };


			/* CON5 */
                        usb3@f0000 {
                                usb-phy = <&usb2_1_phy>;
                                status = "okay";
                        };

                        /* CON7 */
                        usb3@f8000 {
                                usb-phy = <&usb3_phy>;
                                status = "okay";
                        };

Is this clear? Is CON5 a USB 3 host, but has a USB 2 PHY connected to
it? CON7 is the only true USB 3 port? I think some comments written in
schwiizerdütsch would be clearre.:-)

		 Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: armada-38x: label USB and SATA nodes

[Ralph Sennhauser]

On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:21:11 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:39:20PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:50:15 +0200
> > Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > > -			sata@a8000 {
> > > > +			satac0: sata@a8000 {    
> > > 
> > > Hi Ralph
> > > 
> > > Why the c in satac0?  
> > 
> > For controller and to not conflict with a use case of sata0 for a
> > port, similarly to pciec and pcie1. See
> > armada-385-synology-ds116.dts.  
> 
> :~/linux/arch/arm/boot/dts$ ls *ds116*
> ls: cannot access '*ds116*': No such file or directory

Ah, not in mainline yet, from linux-next

  commit a58d73340b0ec93fc29a826e45fbbfbc3f81b7eb
  Author: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
  Date:   Sun Feb 12 10:30:35 2017 +0100

The arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-388-gp.dts from below was
meant as the example for the conflict I mentioned.

> 
> But anyway, a few boards seem to solve this by calling the controller
> node ahci0: and the port sata0:

That's another option I missed.

  $ git grep -n ahci.:
  arch/arm/boot/dts/spear1310.dtsi:59:            ahci0: ahci@b1000000 {
  arch/arm/boot/dts/spear1310.dtsi:68:            ahci1: ahci@b1800000 {
  arch/arm/boot/dts/spear1310.dtsi:77:            ahci2: ahci@b4000000 {
  arch/arm/boot/dts/spear1340.dtsi:42:            ahci0: ahci@b1000000 {

Not a big list which I have here and the nodes themselves are named
ahci@xxxxxxxx.

> 
> > > > -			usb3@f0000 {
> > > > +			usb3_0: usb3@f0000 {
> > > >  				compatible =
> > > > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf0000 0x4000>,<0xf4000
> > > > 0x4000>; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16  
> > > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@  
> > > >  				status = "disabled";
> > > >  			};
> > > >  
> > > > -			usb3@f8000 {
> > > > +			usb3_1: usb3@f8000 {
> > > >  				compatible =
> > > > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf8000 0x4000>,<0xfc000
> > > > 0x4000>; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17  
> > > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;    
> > > 
> > > I can understand what you are saying. But does anybody else care?
> > > Are there other .dtsi files differentiating between USB 1.1, 2
> > > and 3?  
> > 
> > It's handled differently where ever I looked, some do some don't. A
> > case for distinguishing USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 like this is
> > armada-388-gp.dts.  
> 
> Humm...
> 
>                         /* CON4 */
>                         usb@58000 {
>                                 vcc-supply = <&reg_usb2_0_vbus>;
>                                 status = "okay";
>                         };
> 
> 
> 			/* CON5 */
>                         usb3@f0000 {
>                                 usb-phy = <&usb2_1_phy>;
>                                 status = "okay";
>                         };
> 
>                         /* CON7 */
>                         usb3@f8000 {
>                                 usb-phy = <&usb3_phy>;
>                                 status = "okay";
>                         };
> 
> Is this clear? Is CON5 a USB 3 host, but has a USB 2 PHY connected to
> it? CON7 is the only true USB 3 port? I think some comments written in
> schwiizerdütsch would be clearre.:-)

Did you just find a bug? :)

*ufm sprung gxi* (about to head out), sorry for the mix-up. The synology
dts would actually have worked for both usb and sata labels :)

  $git grep -hn -A8 usb3_0_phy: arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-synology-ds116.dts
  191:    usb3_0_phy: usb3_0_phy {
  192-            compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
  193-            vcc-supply = <&reg_usb3_0_vbus>;
  194-    };
  195-
  196-    usb3_1_phy: usb3_1_phy {
  197-            compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
  198-            vcc-supply = <&reg_usb3_1_vbus>;
  199-    };


---

Let's add another argument for and against usb3_x type labels:

  $ git grep -hn usb arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-38x.dtsi
  455:                    usb0: usb@58000 {
  593:                    usb3_0: usb3@f0000 {
  601:                    usb3_1: usb3@f8000 {

They might actually be considered different types. usb vs. usb3, though
that feels quite arbitrary.

  $ git grep -hn usb3_0 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,dwc3.txt
  45:             usb3_0: usb30@0 {

usb3_0 could be mistaken for the protocol version. A bit of a stretch as well ...

First thought was using usb0,usb1,usb2. For the individual linksys
boards this meant a potential pit-fall, namely using "usb2:" for the
only USB 3.0 port while "usb0:" for the only USB 2.0 port appears in the
armada-385-linksys.dtsi only, hence the quest for alternatives.

In the end it boils down to I couldn't make out a definitive standard and
made a pick that felt about right.

If there was an obvious choice there wouldn't have been a reason to omit
the labels this patch handles when handling the bulk. Make the bulk a none
discussion item and handle the corner cases later. Guess that's what
happened here.

Thanks
Ralph
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: armada-38x: label USB and SATA nodes

[Gregory CLEMENT]

Hi Andrew,
 
 On ven., mars 31 2017, Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:39:20PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:50:15 +0200
>> Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> 
>> > > -			sata@a8000 {
>> > > +			satac0: sata@a8000 {  
>> > 
>> > Hi Ralph
>> > 
>> > Why the c in satac0?
>> 
>> For controller and to not conflict with a use case of sata0 for a port,
>> similarly to pciec and pcie1. See armada-385-synology-ds116.dts.
>
> :~/linux/arch/arm/boot/dts$ ls *ds116*
> ls: cannot access '*ds116*': No such file or directory
>
> But anyway, a few boards seem to solve this by calling the controller
> node ahci0: and the port sata0:
>
>> > > -			usb3@f0000 {
>> > > +			usb3_0: usb3@f0000 {
>> > >  				compatible =
>> > > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf0000 0x4000>,<0xf4000 0x4000>;
>> > >  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16
>> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@
>> > >  				status = "disabled";
>> > >  			};
>> > >  
>> > > -			usb3@f8000 {
>> > > +			usb3_1: usb3@f8000 {
>> > >  				compatible =
>> > > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf8000 0x4000>,<0xfc000 0x4000>;
>> > >  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17
>> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;  
>> > 
>> > I can understand what you are saying. But does anybody else care? Are
>> > there other .dtsi files differentiating between USB 1.1, 2 and 3?
>> 
>> It's handled differently where ever I looked, some do some don't. A
>> case for distinguishing USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 like this is
>> armada-388-gp.dts.

Actually I care and I found confusing calling usb2 the second usb port if
it is controlled by an USB3 controller.

>
> Humm...
>
>                         /* CON4 */
>                         usb@58000 {
>                                 vcc-supply = <&reg_usb2_0_vbus>;
>                                 status = "okay";
>                         };
>
>
> 			/* CON5 */
>                         usb3@f0000 {
>                                 usb-phy = <&usb2_1_phy>;
>                                 status = "okay";
>                         };
>
>                         /* CON7 */
>                         usb3@f8000 {
>                                 usb-phy = <&usb3_phy>;
>                                 status = "okay";
>                         };
>
> Is this clear? Is CON5 a USB 3 host, but has a USB 2 PHY connected to
> it? CON7 is the only true USB 3 port? I think some comments written in

I can answer it: CON5 is indeed an USB3 host with a USB2 PHY connected
to it so we can use it only as an USB2. And indeed CON7 is the only true
USB3 port.

> schwiizerdütsch would be clearre.:-)

Actually all your assumption were correct so maybe it is not as
confusing as it looks! :)  But I can add a comment if needed.

Gregory

-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html