Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: armada-38x: label USB and SATA nodes

[Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:50:15 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> > -			sata@a8000 {
> > +			satac0: sata@a8000 {  
> 
> Hi Ralph
> 
> Why the c in satac0?

For controller and to not conflict with a use case of sata0 for a port,
similarly to pciec and pcie1. See armada-385-synology-ds116.dts.

> 
> >  
> > -			usb3@f0000 {
> > +			usb3_0: usb3@f0000 {
> >  				compatible =
> > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf0000 0x4000>,<0xf4000 0x4000>;
> >  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16
> > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@
> >  				status = "disabled";
> >  			};
> >  
> > -			usb3@f8000 {
> > +			usb3_1: usb3@f8000 {
> >  				compatible =
> > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf8000 0x4000>,<0xfc000 0x4000>;
> >  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17
> > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;  
> 
> I can understand what you are saying. But does anybody else care? Are
> there other .dtsi files differentiating between USB 1.1, 2 and 3?

It's handled differently where ever I looked, some do some don't. A
case for distinguishing USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 like this is
armada-388-gp.dts.

Personally I'm only interested in there being a label, making it
"natural" is a bonus though.

Thanks
Ralph

> 
>       Andrew

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html