From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity information code Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:05:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20170410150503.GS17774@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20170327131825.32134-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170327131825.32134-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Juri Lelli Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:18:16PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > arm and arm64 topology.c share a lot of code related to parsing of capacity > information. This is v3 of a solution [1] (based on Will's, Catalin's and > Mark's off-line suggestions) to move such common code in a single place: > drivers/base/arch_topology.c (by creating such file and conditionally compiling > it for arm and arm64 only). I think overall this is okay, with the exception of one patch which seems to be wrongly worded. Once that's resolved, then: Acked-by: Russell King for the series. Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.