[PATCH 0/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: device tree cleanup

[PATCH 0/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: device tree cleanup

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

Hi Maxime,

Here are a few patches cleaning up sun8i-a83t.dtsi. These get rid
of known warnings and deprecated features. I'm sending these now
before I send patches that add new stuff.

Regards
ChenYu

Chen-Yu Tsai (3):
  ARM: sun8i: a83t: Drop skeleton.dtsi
  ARM: sun8i: a83t: Drop leading zeroes from device node addresses
  ARM: sun8i: a83t: Rename pinmux setting names

 .../boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-allwinner-h8homlet-v2.dts  |  2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-cubietruck-plus.dts   |  2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi                  | 36 ++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 1/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Drop skeleton.dtsi

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

skeleton.dtsi is deprecated. Remove it from sun8i-a83t.dtsi and add
the needed device nodes directly.

Also drop an extra, non-style-conforming line in the copyright license
header.

Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
index 0ec143773ee9..913aacafe8d5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
@@ -40,15 +40,20 @@
  *     WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
  *     FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
  *     OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
-
  */
 
-#include "skeleton.dtsi"
-
 #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
 
 / {
 	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <1>;
+
+	aliases {
+	};
+
+	chosen {
+	};
 
 	cpus {
 		#address-cells = <1>;
@@ -146,6 +151,11 @@
 		};
 	};
 
+	memory {
+		reg = <0x40000000 0x80000000>;
+		device_type = "memory";
+	};
+
 	soc {
 		compatible = "simple-bus";
 		#address-cells = <1>;
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 2/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Drop leading zeroes from device node addresses

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

Kbuild now complains about leading zeroes in the address portion of
device node names.

Get rid of them.

Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
index 913aacafe8d5..82cb87f21b96 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
 		#size-cells = <1>;
 		ranges;
 
-		pio: pinctrl@01c20800 {
+		pio: pinctrl@1c20800 {
 			compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-pinctrl";
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 15 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
 				     <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
 			};
 		};
 
-		timer@01c20c00 {
+		timer@1c20c00 {
 			compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-timer";
 			reg = <0x01c20c00 0xa0>;
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 18 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
@@ -201,14 +201,14 @@
 			clocks = <&osc24M>;
 		};
 
-		watchdog@01c20ca0 {
+		watchdog@1c20ca0 {
 			compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt";
 			reg = <0x01c20ca0 0x20>;
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 			clocks = <&osc24M>;
 		};
 
-		uart0: serial@01c28000 {
+		uart0: serial@1c28000 {
 			compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart";
 			reg = <0x01c28000 0x400>;
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@
 			status = "disabled";
 		};
 
-		gic: interrupt-controller@01c81000 {
+		gic: interrupt-controller@1c81000 {
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-gic", "arm,cortex-a15-gic";
 			reg = <0x01c81000 0x1000>,
 			      <0x01c82000 0x2000>,
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Drop leading zeroes from device node addresses

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 864 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22:04PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Kbuild now complains about leading zeroes in the address portion of
> device node names.
> 
> Get rid of them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> index 913aacafe8d5..82cb87f21b96 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
>  		#size-cells = <1>;
>  		ranges;
>  
> -		pio: pinctrl@01c20800 {
> +		pio: pinctrl@1c20800 {

As far as I know this breaks Uboot's auto-addition of stdout-path

Maxime
> 

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Drop leading zeroes from device node addresses

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22:04PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> Kbuild now complains about leading zeroes in the address portion of
>> device node names.
>>
>> Get rid of them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi | 10 +++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
>> index 913aacafe8d5..82cb87f21b96 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
>>               #size-cells = <1>;
>>               ranges;
>>
>> -             pio: pinctrl@01c20800 {
>> +             pio: pinctrl@1c20800 {
>
> As far as I know this breaks Uboot's auto-addition of stdout-path

You're right. It breaks as Uboot has the path to the uarts hard-coded.
That sucks. And from what I can tell, it's not easily solvable by just
switching to serial alias based references. CONS_INDEX won't line up
on the A23/A33 Q8 tablets.

Maybe we can just keep the uart device node the same for now, but fix
all the other ones. We can come back and fix the uart later once we
figure out how to fix Uboot.

Regards
ChenYu

Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Drop leading zeroes from device node addresses

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1852 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:22:02PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22:04PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> Kbuild now complains about leading zeroes in the address portion of
> >> device node names.
> >>
> >> Get rid of them.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi | 10 +++++-----
> >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> >> index 913aacafe8d5..82cb87f21b96 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> >> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
> >>               #size-cells = <1>;
> >>               ranges;
> >>
> >> -             pio: pinctrl@01c20800 {
> >> +             pio: pinctrl@1c20800 {
> >
> > As far as I know this breaks Uboot's auto-addition of stdout-path
> 
> You're right. It breaks as Uboot has the path to the uarts hard-coded.
> That sucks. And from what I can tell, it's not easily solvable by just
> switching to serial alias based references. CONS_INDEX won't line up
> on the A23/A33 Q8 tablets.
> 
> Maybe we can just keep the uart device node the same for now, but fix
> all the other ones. We can come back and fix the uart later once we
> figure out how to fix Uboot.

Thinking more about this, I don't really know why we have that in
U-Boot actually. All our DTs for a very long time have had stdout-path
properly set (and if it's improperly set, this should be fixed). I'd
say we can simply remove that from U-Boot and be done with it.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Rename pinmux setting names

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

The pinmux setting nodes all have an address element in their node
names, however the pinctrl node does not have #address-cells.

Rename the existing pinmux setting nodes and labels in sun8i-a83t.dtsi,
dropping identifiers for functions that only have one possible setting,
and using the pingroup name if the function is identically available on
different pingroups.

Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-allwinner-h8homlet-v2.dts |  2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-cubietruck-plus.dts       |  2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi                      | 10 +++++-----
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-allwinner-h8homlet-v2.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-allwinner-h8homlet-v2.dts
index 342e1d33fa1c..aecdeeb368ed 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-allwinner-h8homlet-v2.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-allwinner-h8homlet-v2.dts
@@ -59,6 +59,6 @@
 
 &uart0 {
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
-	pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_pins_b>;
+	pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_pb_pins>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-cubietruck-plus.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-cubietruck-plus.dts
index 88b1e0970b8d..d2614f101ecc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-cubietruck-plus.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-cubietruck-plus.dts
@@ -60,6 +60,6 @@
 
 &uart0 {
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
-	pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_pins_b>;
+	pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_pb_pins>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
index 82cb87f21b96..87b99338716b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
 			#interrupt-cells = <3>;
 			#gpio-cells = <3>;
 
-			mmc0_pins_a: mmc0@0 {
+			mmc0_pins: mmc0_pins {
 				pins = "PF0", "PF1", "PF2",
 				       "PF3", "PF4", "PF5";
 				function = "mmc0";
@@ -182,13 +182,13 @@
 				bias-pull-up;
 			};
 
-			uart0_pins_a: uart0@0 {
-				pins = "PF2", "PF4";
+			uart0_pb_pins: uart0_pb_pins {
+				pins = "PB9", "PB10";
 				function = "uart0";
 			};
 
-			uart0_pins_b: uart0@1 {
-				pins = "PB9", "PB10";
+			uart0_pf_pins: uart0_pf_pins {
+				pins = "PF2", "PF4";
 				function = "uart0";
 			};
 		};
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Rename pinmux setting names

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 705 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22:05PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The pinmux setting nodes all have an address element in their node
> names, however the pinctrl node does not have #address-cells.
> 
> Rename the existing pinmux setting nodes and labels in sun8i-a83t.dtsi,
> dropping identifiers for functions that only have one possible setting,
> and using the pingroup name if the function is identically available on
> different pingroups.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>

Applied, and I really like the new names.

Would you make the same patch for everyone?
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Rename pinmux setting names

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22:05PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> The pinmux setting nodes all have an address element in their node
>> names, however the pinctrl node does not have #address-cells.
>>
>> Rename the existing pinmux setting nodes and labels in sun8i-a83t.dtsi,
>> dropping identifiers for functions that only have one possible setting,
>> and using the pingroup name if the function is identically available on
>> different pingroups.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>
>
> Applied, and I really like the new names.
>
> Would you make the same patch for everyone?

I can. No guarantees on the schedule though.

ChenYu

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Rename pinmux setting names

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1071 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:16:53PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22:05PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> The pinmux setting nodes all have an address element in their node
> >> names, however the pinctrl node does not have #address-cells.
> >>
> >> Rename the existing pinmux setting nodes and labels in sun8i-a83t.dtsi,
> >> dropping identifiers for functions that only have one possible setting,
> >> and using the pingroup name if the function is identically available on
> >> different pingroups.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > Applied, and I really like the new names.
> >
> > Would you make the same patch for everyone?
> 
> I can. No guarantees on the schedule though.

Sure, I know this isn't really the most entertaining and fulfilling
patch to make ;)

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Rename pinmux setting names

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> The pinmux setting nodes all have an address element in their node
> names, however the pinctrl node does not have #address-cells.
>
> Rename the existing pinmux setting nodes and labels in sun8i-a83t.dtsi,
> dropping identifiers for functions that only have one possible setting,
> and using the pingroup name if the function is identically available on
> different pingroups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-allwinner-h8homlet-v2.dts |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-cubietruck-plus.dts       |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi                      | 10 +++++-----
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> index 82cb87f21b96..87b99338716b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
>                         #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>                         #gpio-cells = <3>;
>
> -                       mmc0_pins_a: mmc0@0 {
> +                       mmc0_pins: mmc0_pins {
>                                 pins = "PF0", "PF1", "PF2",
>                                        "PF3", "PF4", "PF5";
>                                 function = "mmc0";
> @@ -182,13 +182,13 @@
>                                 bias-pull-up;
>                         };
>
> -                       uart0_pins_a: uart0@0 {
> -                               pins = "PF2", "PF4";
> +                       uart0_pb_pins: uart0_pb_pins {

Duh... Forgot to use hyphens instead of underscores in the node names.
I'll send a patch for you to squash in.

ChenYu

> +                               pins = "PB9", "PB10";
>                                 function = "uart0";
>                         };
>
> -                       uart0_pins_b: uart0@1 {
> -                               pins = "PB9", "PB10";
> +                       uart0_pf_pins: uart0_pf_pins {
> +                               pins = "PF2", "PF4";
>                                 function = "uart0";
>                         };
>                 };
> --
> 2.11.0
>