From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Rename pinmux setting names Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:04:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20170418090447.dcxinewczubf26b7@lukather> References: <20170418042205.27894-1-wens@csie.org> <20170418042205.27894-4-wens@csie.org> Reply-To: maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iw2gqtfcwqivwbeu" Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170418042205.27894-4-wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --iw2gqtfcwqivwbeu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22:05PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > The pinmux setting nodes all have an address element in their node > names, however the pinctrl node does not have #address-cells. > > Rename the existing pinmux setting nodes and labels in sun8i-a83t.dtsi, > dropping identifiers for functions that only have one possible setting, > and using the pingroup name if the function is identically available on > different pingroups. > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai Applied, and I really like the new names. Would you make the same patch for everyone? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com --iw2gqtfcwqivwbeu--