From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:42:16 +0530 Message-ID: <20170419101216.GC5436@vireshk-i7> References: <468e756b-7112-4006-b31d-9fcf1c32673d@arm.com> <20170413055049.GN5910@vireshk-i7> <854e3f66-6f93-2b90-14a9-7eaea6a0b74c@arm.com> <20170417053303.GG28191@vireshk-i7> <2128c09a-0656-0878-c4e7-c327007021c7@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2128c09a-0656-0878-c4e7-c327007021c7@arm.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sudeep Holla Cc: Rafael Wysocki , ulf.hansson@linaro.org, Kevin Hilman , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , Stephen Boyd , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , robh+dt@kernel.org, lina.iyer@linaro.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 18-04-17, 17:03, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Was it posted externally ? Was there any objections for that approach ? > IMO that's better approach but if I am late to the party, I would like > to read through the discussions that happened on it(if any) Maybe Stephen can tell more about it. AFAIK, there were some offline discussions around it. -- viresh