From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: r8a7795: update PFC node name to pin-controller Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:48:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20170426074800.GG25517@verge.net.au> References: <1493023915-21658-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux-Renesas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Magnus Damm , Sergei Shtylyov , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:03:54AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Simon Horman > wrote: > > The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller > > as the node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step > > towards unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to > > be more the more generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT > > s/be more/be/ > > > specs. > > > > My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel > > logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc@e6060000 to > > e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6060000. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Thanks, I fixed the typo when queuing this up.