From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/sequoia: fix NAND partitions not to overlap Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 11:48:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20170518094813.GA12038@amd> References: <20170402100535.GA18340@amd> <20170517120613.GA583@amd> <20170517143717.ad818a2282378fc7a38af1ff@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170517143717.ad818a2282378fc7a38af1ff-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: sr-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org, jwboyer-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, mpe-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, trivial-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Andrew Morton List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed 2017-05-17 14:37:17, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 17 May 2017 14:06:13 +0200 Pavel Machek wrote: >=20 > > On Sun 2017-04-02 12:05:36, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Fix overlapping NAND partitions. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek > >=20 > > Ping? Two partitions at same place are bad news... >=20 > Please expand on "bad news"? What are the runtime effects of this > change? Decisions about which kernel(s) to patch depend on this info. Well... two partitions at same place. If you use one, you will corrupt information on the other one. OTOH this moves partition around (so that they don't overlap) so it is probably not stable candidate. I guess this is not huge issue; people using these boards probably have custom dts changes, anyway... Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlkdbd0ACgkQMOfwapXb+vKSwgCdEH0np4PeA0yHxMf1KJy8HJ7I fE8AoKN4cfbkO+bYmOOzY/msQyboWBPW =p+oE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html