Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

Mark Brown
2017-06-07T15:42:06Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 859 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:09:56PM +0000, Steve Twiss wrote:
> On 07 June 2017 10:42, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I'm missing the other patches in this series and the cover letter, what
> > are the dependencies here?

> My apologies Mark. I didn't re-send the cover letter because this regulator
> patch is the last one and I assumed it would not add anything.
> Am I confusing you here by not renaming the patch and leaving its subject
> as [PATCH V7 5/7]?

Yes, you are confusing things. You're missing the point of numbering
patches in a series, it's so that when working with a set of patches
that have been posted pople know what order to apply them in. The
numbering only means anything in a given posting of the series, if
something is resent it doesn't matter if it was posted before the
numbering should reflect what's being posted at the current time.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]