From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 22:07:43 +0530
Message-ID: <20170601163743.GE2885@localhost>
References: <20170528093051.11816-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
 <20170528093051.11816-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170528093051.11816-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:30:44AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> It is 'R-Car', not 'r-car'. No code or binding changes, only descriptive text.


Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod