From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/21] net-next: stmmac: add dwmac-sun8i ethernet driver Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 10:22:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20170602.102205.701672574727845689.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20170601.145819.789604139072328057.davem@davemloft.net> <20170602063752.aqyvwcykvepiyt4y@flea.lan> <20170602091320.lyfxsanxrypfpozb@flea.lan> Reply-To: davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org In-Reply-To: <20170602091320.lyfxsanxrypfpozb-ZC1Zs529Oq4@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Cc: clabbe.montjoie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org, linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org, catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, peppe.cavallaro-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, alexandre.torgue-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org From: Maxime Ripard Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:13:20 +0200 > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 08:37:52AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:58:19PM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> > From: Corentin Labbe >> > Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 09:18:31 +0200 >> > >> > > This patch series add the driver for dwmac-sun8i which handle the Ethernet MAC >> > > present on Allwinner H3/H5/A83T/A64 SoCs. >> > >> > Series applied, but wow that's a lot of DT file changes :-( >> >> The DT patches should not go through your tree, but arm-soc, so I >> guess this is not an issue for you? > > Ok, so I saw that you actually merged them. Can you revert or drop > that merge for the DT part? > > This will generate a lot of conflicts with our tree, and I'm not sure > this would be efficient to make you take all the entirely unrelated to > next patches. Please tell me which specific changes to revert. Thank you.