From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/21] net-next: stmmac: add dwmac-sun8i ethernet driver Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:13:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20170602091320.lyfxsanxrypfpozb@flea.lan> References: <20170531071852.12422-1-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <20170601.145819.789604139072328057.davem@davemloft.net> <20170602063752.aqyvwcykvepiyt4y@flea.lan> Reply-To: maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mi7hxpmao4xr3bre" Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170602063752.aqyvwcykvepiyt4y-ZC1Zs529Oq4@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: David Miller Cc: clabbe.montjoie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org, linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org, catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, peppe.cavallaro-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, alexandre.torgue-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --mi7hxpmao4xr3bre Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 08:37:52AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:58:19PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > > From: Corentin Labbe > > Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 09:18:31 +0200 > > > > > This patch series add the driver for dwmac-sun8i which handle the Ethernet MAC > > > present on Allwinner H3/H5/A83T/A64 SoCs. > > > > Series applied, but wow that's a lot of DT file changes :-( > > The DT patches should not go through your tree, but arm-soc, so I > guess this is not an issue for you? Ok, so I saw that you actually merged them. Can you revert or drop that merge for the DT part? This will generate a lot of conflicts with our tree, and I'm not sure this would be efficient to make you take all the entirely unrelated to next patches. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com --mi7hxpmao4xr3bre--