From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/34] [media] add Omnivision OV5640 sensor driver Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 21:51:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20170603195139.GA3062@amd> References: <1495672189-29164-1-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <1495672189-29164-17-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <20170531195821.GA16962@amd> <20170601082659.GJ1019@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <755909bf-d1de-e0f3-1569-0d4b16e26817@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <755909bf-d1de-e0f3-1569-0d4b16e26817-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Steve Longerbeam Cc: Sakari Ailus , robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, shawnguo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, fabio.estevam-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org, linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org, mchehab-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, hverkuil-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org, nick-gcszYUEDH4VrovVCs/uTlw@public.gmane.org, markus.heiser-O6JHGLzbNUwb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org, p.zabel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, laurent.pinchart+renesas-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org, bparrot-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org, geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org, arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org, sudipm.mukherjee-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, minghsiu.tsai-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, tiffany.lin-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, jean-christophe.trotin-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, horms+renesas-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org, niklas.soderlund+renesas-1zkq55x86MTxsAP9Fp7wbw@public.gmane.org, robert.jarzmik-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org, songjun.wu-UWL1GkI3JZL3oGB3hsPCZA@public.gmane.org, andrew-ct.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, shuah-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, sakari.ailus-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.i List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > >>>+ /* Auto/manual exposure */ > >>>+ ctrls->auto_exp =3D v4l2_ctrl_new_std_menu(hdl, ops, > >>>+ V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_AUTO, > >>>+ V4L2_EXPOSURE_MANUAL, 0, > >>>+ V4L2_EXPOSURE_AUTO); > >>>+ ctrls->exposure =3D v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl, ops, > >>>+ V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE, > >>>+ 0, 65535, 1, 0); > >> > >>Is exposure_absolute supposed to be in microseconds...? > > > >Yes. >=20 > According to the docs V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE is in 100 usec units. >=20 > OTOH V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE has no defined unit, so it's a better fit IMO. > >Way more drivers appear to be using EXPOSURE than EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE, too. >=20 > Done, switched to V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE. It's true, this control is not > taking 100 usec units, so unit-less is better. Thanks. If you know the units, it would be of course better to use right units... Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlkzE0sACgkQMOfwapXb+vJeTQCdF9aH5BvEXWZ5xpMOhFiSkPP7 dUsAn1qJEWtiQpHhNWQiWi6JuiAD9VsK =VXOJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html