From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: amlogic: add unstable statement Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 09:20:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20170705142015.tmlmes5lobadndsy@rob-hp-laptop> References: <20170628145343.25443-1-khilman@baylibre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170628145343.25443-1-khilman-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-amlogic-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 07:53:43AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Due to the lack of documentation on this SoC family, discovery of new > features, and correcting of previous misunderstandings is expected, so > it's unrealistic to expect any form of stable bindings for this SoC > family. Make that clear inthe binding documentation. s/inthe/in the/ > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) I've yet to see anyone remove an unstable tag and I'd rather see these for individual bindings than for the platform as a whole. In the end, it's a platform maintainers decision whether to accept compatibility breakage regardless of some text that probably no one reads. In any case, Acked-by: Rob Herring -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html