From: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: Abstract register accesses
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:07:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170719190734.18566-6-opendmb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170719190734.18566-1-opendmb@gmail.com>
Added register block offsets to the brcmstb_l2_intc_data structure
for the status and mask registers to support reading the active
interupts in an abstracted way. It seems like an irq_chip method
should have been provided for this, but it's not there yet.
Abstracted the implementation of the handler, suspend, and resume
functions to not use any hard coded register offsets.
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
index 977ae55d47d4..ce3850530e2b 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-brcmstb-l2.c
@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
struct brcmstb_l2_intc_data {
struct irq_domain *domain;
struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
+ int status_offset;
+ int mask_offset;
bool can_wake;
u32 saved_mask; /* for suspend/resume */
};
@@ -56,8 +58,8 @@ static void brcmstb_l2_intc_irq_handle(struct irq_desc *desc)
chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
- status = irq_reg_readl(b->gc, CPU_STATUS) &
- ~(irq_reg_readl(b->gc, CPU_MASK_STATUS));
+ status = irq_reg_readl(b->gc, b->status_offset) &
+ ~(irq_reg_readl(b->gc, b->mask_offset));
if (status == 0) {
raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
@@ -78,16 +80,17 @@ static void brcmstb_l2_intc_irq_handle(struct irq_desc *desc)
static void brcmstb_l2_intc_suspend(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct irq_chip_type *ct = irq_data_get_chip_type(d);
struct brcmstb_l2_intc_data *b = gc->private;
irq_gc_lock(gc);
/* Save the current mask */
- b->saved_mask = irq_reg_readl(gc, CPU_MASK_STATUS);
+ b->saved_mask = irq_reg_readl(gc, ct->regs.mask);
if (b->can_wake) {
/* Program the wakeup mask */
- irq_reg_writel(gc, ~gc->wake_active, CPU_MASK_SET);
- irq_reg_writel(gc, gc->wake_active, CPU_MASK_CLEAR);
+ irq_reg_writel(gc, ~gc->wake_active, ct->regs.disable);
+ irq_reg_writel(gc, gc->wake_active, ct->regs.enable);
}
irq_gc_unlock(gc);
}
@@ -95,15 +98,19 @@ static void brcmstb_l2_intc_suspend(struct irq_data *d)
static void brcmstb_l2_intc_resume(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ struct irq_chip_type *ct = irq_data_get_chip_type(d);
struct brcmstb_l2_intc_data *b = gc->private;
irq_gc_lock(gc);
- /* Clear unmasked non-wakeup interrupts */
- irq_reg_writel(gc, ~b->saved_mask & ~gc->wake_active, CPU_CLEAR);
+ if (ct->chip.irq_ack != irq_gc_noop) {
+ /* Clear unmasked non-wakeup interrupts */
+ irq_reg_writel(gc, ~b->saved_mask & ~gc->wake_active,
+ ct->regs.ack);
+ }
/* Restore the saved mask */
- irq_reg_writel(gc, b->saved_mask, CPU_MASK_SET);
- irq_reg_writel(gc, ~b->saved_mask, CPU_MASK_CLEAR);
+ irq_reg_writel(gc, b->saved_mask, ct->regs.disable);
+ irq_reg_writel(gc, ~b->saved_mask, ct->regs.enable);
irq_gc_unlock(gc);
}
@@ -173,6 +180,9 @@ static int __init brcmstb_l2_intc_of_init(struct device_node *np,
data->gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(data->domain, 0);
data->gc->reg_base = base;
data->gc->private = data;
+ data->status_offset = CPU_STATUS;
+ data->mask_offset = CPU_MASK_STATUS;
+
ct = data->gc->chip_types;
ct->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
@@ -181,6 +191,7 @@ static int __init brcmstb_l2_intc_of_init(struct device_node *np,
ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_disable_reg;
ct->chip.irq_mask_ack = irq_gc_mask_disable_and_ack_set;
ct->regs.disable = CPU_MASK_SET;
+ ct->regs.mask = CPU_MASK_STATUS;
ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_unmask_enable_reg;
ct->regs.enable = CPU_MASK_CLEAR;
--
2.13.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-19 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-19 19:07 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add support for BCM7271 style interrupt controller Doug Berger
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] genirq: generic chip: add irq_gc_mask_disable_and_ack_set() Doug Berger
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] irqchip/tango: Use irq_gc_mask_disable_and_ack_set Doug Berger
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] genirq: generic chip: remove irq_gc_mask_disable_reg_and_ack() Doug Berger
[not found] ` <20170719190734.18566-1-opendmb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: Remove some processing from the handler Doug Berger
2017-07-19 19:07 ` Doug Berger [this message]
2017-07-19 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: Add support for the BCM7271 L2 controller Doug Berger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170719190734.18566-6-opendmb@gmail.com \
--to=opendmb@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=cernekee@gmail.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.0xf0@gmail.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sf84@laposte.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).