From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola, cpcap-audio-codec Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 09:53:59 -0700 Message-ID: <20170810165358.GK8569@atomide.com> References: <20170725151030.26863-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk> <20170725151030.26863-3-sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk> <20170726114827.pye3jm2b7x2nqo5v@sirena.org.uk> <20170727090141.sxzm6mq5cv4jzucg@earth> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170727090141.sxzm6mq5cv4jzucg@earth> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Sebastian Reichel Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai , Rob Herring , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Sebastian Reichel [170727 02:02]: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:48:28PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 05:10:26PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > > Motorola CPCAP is a PMIC with audio functionality, that can be > > > found on Motorola Droid 4 and probably a few other phones from > > > Motorola's Droid series. > > > > Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the > > subsystem. This makes it easier for people to identify relevant > > patches. Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are > > doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're > > doing. > > Right, I did not notice, that ASoC does not follow general > "dt-bindings: :" DT bindings subject style. How > do Rob and Mark find them? > > > > +&cpcap { > > > + audio-codec { > > > + compatible = "motorola,cpcap-audio-codec"; > > > + vdd-supply = <&vaudio>; > > > + }; > > > +}; > > > > I'd expect supplies (especially generically named supplies like this) to > > be looked up at the chip level - aside from my general concerns with MFD > > subnodes like this in the case of supplies it's especially problematic > > as it makes it harder to do the generic chip level hookup in the DT and > > it precludes other parts of the chip using the same supply (which seems > > especially likely with a generically named supply like this). > > I don't follow you here. Why can't other parts of the chip use the > same supply? Regarding the other point: Handling the audio-codec > differently than all other sub-modules of cpcap seems much more > problematic to me and the codec is basically the last one > missing: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/motorola-cpcap-mapphone.dtsi Mark, any comments on the above? I'm just wondering if the related dts changes are safe for me to pick. Regards, Tony