devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-compiler-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] checks: add phandle with arg property checks
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:03:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824020338.GV5379@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170822230208.20987-2-robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8929 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 06:02:06PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Many common bindings follow the same pattern of client properties
> containing a phandle and N arg cells where N is defined in the provider
> with a '#<specifier>-cells' property such as:
> 
> 	intc0: interrupt-controller@0 {
> 		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> 	};
> 	intc1: interrupt-controller@1 {
> 		#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> 	};
> 
> 	node {
> 		interrupts-extended = <&intc0 1 2 3>, <&intc1 4 5>;
> 	};
> 
> Add checks for properties following this pattern.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> v2:
> - Make each property a separate check
> - Iterate over raw cells rather than markers
> - Fix property length check for 2nd to Nth items
> - Improve error messages. If cell sizes are wrong, the next iteration can
>   get a bad (but valid) phandle.
> - Add a test
> 
>  checks.c                    | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  dtc.h                       |   1 +
>  livetree.c                  |   6 +++
>  tests/bad-phandle-cells.dts |  11 +++++
>  tests/run_tests.sh          |   1 +
>  5 files changed, 123 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tests/bad-phandle-cells.dts
> 
> diff --git a/checks.c b/checks.c
> index afabf64337d5..548d7e118c42 100644
> --- a/checks.c
> +++ b/checks.c
> @@ -956,6 +956,93 @@ static void check_obsolete_chosen_interrupt_controller(struct check *c,
>  WARNING(obsolete_chosen_interrupt_controller,
>  	check_obsolete_chosen_interrupt_controller, NULL);
>  
> +struct provider {
> +	const char *prop_name;
> +	const char *cell_name;
> +	bool optional;

AFAICT you don't actually use this optional flag, even in the followup
patches; it's always false.

> +};
> +
> +static void check_property_phandle_args(struct check *c,
> +					  struct dt_info *dti,
> +				          struct node *node,
> +				          struct property *prop,
> +				          const struct provider *provider)
> +{
> +	struct node *root = dti->dt;
> +	int cell, cellsize = 0;
> +
> +	for (cell = 0; cell < prop->val.len / sizeof(cell_t); cell += cellsize + 1) {
> +		struct node *provider_node;
> +		struct property *cellprop;
> +		int phandle;
> +
> +		phandle = propval_cell_n(prop, cell);
> +		if (phandle == 0 || phandle == -1) {
> +			cellsize = 0;
> +			continue;

I'm not clear what case this is handling.  If the property has an
invalid (or unresolved) phandle value, shouldn't that be a FAIL?  As
it is we interpret the next cell as a phandle, and since we couldn't
resolve the first phandle, we can't be at all sure that it really is a
phandle.

> +		}
> +
> +		provider_node = get_node_by_phandle(root, phandle);
> +		if (!provider_node) {
> +			FAIL(c, dti, "Could not get phandle node for %s:%s(cell %d)",
> +			     node->fullpath, prop->name, cell);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		cellprop = get_property(provider_node, provider->cell_name);
> +		if (cellprop) {
> +			cellsize = propval_cell(cellprop);
> +		} else if (provider->optional) {
> +			cellsize = 0;
> +		} else {
> +			FAIL(c, dti, "Missing property '%s' in node %s or bad phandle (referred from %s:%s[%d])",
> +			     provider->cell_name,
> +			     provider_node->fullpath,
> +			     node->fullpath, prop->name, cell);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (prop->val.len < ((cell + cellsize + 1) * sizeof(cell_t))) {
> +			FAIL(c, dti, "%s property size (%d) too small for cell size %d in %s",
> +			     prop->name, prop->val.len, cellsize, node->fullpath);
> +		}

How will this cope if the property is really badly formed - e.g. a 3
byte property, so you can't even grab a whole first phandle?  I think
it will trip the assert() in propval_cell_n() which isn't great.

> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void check_provider_cells_property(struct check *c,
> +					  struct dt_info *dti,
> +				          struct node *node)
> +{
> +	struct provider *provider = c->data;
> +	struct property *prop;
> +
> +	prop = get_property(node, provider->prop_name);
> +	if (!prop)
> +		return;
> +
> +	check_property_phandle_args(c, dti, node, prop, provider);
> +}
> +#define WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(nm, propname, cells_name, ...) \
> +	static struct provider nm##_provider = { (propname), (cells_name), __VA_ARGS__ }; \
> +	WARNING(nm##_property, check_provider_cells_property, &nm##_provider, &phandle_references);
> +
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(clocks, "clocks", "#clock-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(cooling_device, "cooling-device", "#cooling-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(dmas, "dmas", "#dma-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(hwlocks, "hwlocks", "#hwlock-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(interrupts_extended, "interrupts-extended", "#interrupt-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(io_channels, "io-channels", "#io-channel-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(iommus, "iommus", "#iommu-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(mboxes, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(msi_parent, "msi-parent", "#msi-cells", true);
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(mux_controls, "mux-controls", "#mux-control-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(phys, "phys", "#phy-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(power_domains, "power-domains", "#power-domain-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(pwms, "pwms", "#pwm-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(resets, "resets", "#reset-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(sound_dais, "sound-dais", "#sound-dai-cells");
> +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(thermal_sensors, "thermal-sensors", "#thermal-sensor-cells");
> +
>  static struct check *check_table[] = {
>  	&duplicate_node_names, &duplicate_property_names,
>  	&node_name_chars, &node_name_format, &property_name_chars,
> @@ -987,6 +1074,23 @@ static struct check *check_table[] = {
>  	&avoid_default_addr_size,
>  	&obsolete_chosen_interrupt_controller,
>  
> +	&clocks_property,
> +	&cooling_device_property,
> +	&dmas_property,
> +	&hwlocks_property,
> +	&interrupts_extended_property,
> +	&io_channels_property,
> +	&iommus_property,
> +	&mboxes_property,
> +	&msi_parent_property,
> +	&mux_controls_property,
> +	&phys_property,
> +	&power_domains_property,
> +	&pwms_property,
> +	&resets_property,
> +	&sound_dais_property,
> +	&thermal_sensors_property,
> +
>  	&always_fail,
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/dtc.h b/dtc.h
> index 409db76c94b7..3c0532a7c3ab 100644
> --- a/dtc.h
> +++ b/dtc.h
> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ void append_to_property(struct node *node,
>  const char *get_unitname(struct node *node);
>  struct property *get_property(struct node *node, const char *propname);
>  cell_t propval_cell(struct property *prop);
> +cell_t propval_cell_n(struct property *prop, int n);
>  struct property *get_property_by_label(struct node *tree, const char *label,
>  				       struct node **node);
>  struct marker *get_marker_label(struct node *tree, const char *label,
> diff --git a/livetree.c b/livetree.c
> index aecd27875fdd..c815176ec241 100644
> --- a/livetree.c
> +++ b/livetree.c
> @@ -396,6 +396,12 @@ cell_t propval_cell(struct property *prop)
>  	return fdt32_to_cpu(*((fdt32_t *)prop->val.val));
>  }
>  
> +cell_t propval_cell_n(struct property *prop, int n)
> +{
> +	assert(prop->val.len / sizeof(cell_t) >= n);
> +	return fdt32_to_cpu(*((fdt32_t *)prop->val.val + n));
> +}
> +
>  struct property *get_property_by_label(struct node *tree, const char *label,
>  				       struct node **node)
>  {
> diff --git a/tests/bad-phandle-cells.dts b/tests/bad-phandle-cells.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7f7c6a25fd25
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/bad-phandle-cells.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +/ {
> +	intc: interrupt-controller {
> +		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> +	};
> +
> +	node {
> +		interrupts-extended = <&intc>;
> +	};
> +};
> diff --git a/tests/run_tests.sh b/tests/run_tests.sh
> index 3bc5b41ce76d..7cbc6971130a 100755
> --- a/tests/run_tests.sh
> +++ b/tests/run_tests.sh
> @@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ dtc_tests () {
>      check_tests unit-addr-without-reg.dts unit_address_vs_reg
>      check_tests unit-addr-leading-0x.dts unit_address_format
>      check_tests unit-addr-leading-0s.dts unit_address_format
> +    check_tests bad-phandle-cells.dts interrupts_extended_property
>      run_sh_test dtc-checkfails.sh node_name_chars -- -I dtb -O dtb bad_node_char.dtb
>      run_sh_test dtc-checkfails.sh node_name_format -- -I dtb -O dtb bad_node_format.dtb
>      run_sh_test dtc-checkfails.sh prop_name_chars -- -I dtb -O dtb bad_prop_char.dtb

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-24  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-22 23:02 [PATCH v2 0/3] dtc: checks for phandle with arg properties Rob Herring
     [not found] ` <20170822230208.20987-1-robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-22 23:02   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] checks: add phandle with arg property checks Rob Herring
     [not found]     ` <20170822230208.20987-2-robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-24  2:03       ` David Gibson [this message]
     [not found]         ` <20170824020338.GV5379-K0bRW+63XPQe6aEkudXLsA@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-24 17:23           ` Rob Herring
     [not found]             ` <CAL_Jsq+0Njjs_PHBSD-B7W9YFzdfpB2ApBcBD=48+BoXQKv2pw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-24 19:19               ` Rob Herring
     [not found]                 ` <CAL_Jsq+NVBF6npai2_CRSVchGN_EQBSYnQcw3rHZcNFKpP7pDg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-25 13:17                   ` David Gibson
     [not found]                     ` <20170825131727.GJ2772-K0bRW+63XPQe6aEkudXLsA@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-25 15:27                       ` Rob Herring
     [not found]                         ` <CAL_JsqKv=0Bu84Q0Mo9W9NhHqHE5VWCH_w38g=YMQ9ZCGqTFHw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-29  7:26                           ` David Gibson
2017-08-25  0:49               ` David Gibson
2017-08-25  1:58                 ` Rob Herring
2017-08-22 23:02   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] checks: add gpio binding properties check Rob Herring
     [not found]     ` <20170822230208.20987-3-robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-24  2:11       ` David Gibson
2017-08-22 23:02   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] checks: add interrupts property check Rob Herring
     [not found]     ` <20170822230208.20987-4-robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-24  2:15       ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170824020338.GV5379@umbus.fritz.box \
    --to=david-xt8fgy+axnrb3ne2bgzf6laj5h9x9tb+@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-compiler-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).