From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Shyti Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] input: Add MediaTek PMIC keys support Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 16:34:53 +0900 Message-ID: <20170829073453.GB4469@gangnam> References: <1503642753-12385-1-git-send-email-chen.zhong@mediatek.com> <1503642753-12385-5-git-send-email-chen.zhong@mediatek.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: <1503642753-12385-5-git-send-email-chen.zhong@mediatek.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chen Zhong Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Matthias Brugger , Lee Jones , Eddie Huang , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Javier Martinez Canillas , Linus Walleij , Jaechul Lee , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Chen, what I would ask you is to be consistent with the naming, if your driver is called mtk-pmic, then all your functions and global variables should be named accordingly as mtk_pmic or MTK_PMIC. Please check in between the lines for real examples: > +#define PWRKEY_RST_EN_MASK 0x1 > +#define PWRKEY_RST_EN_SHIFT 6 > +#define HOMEKEY_RST_EN_MASK 0x1 > +#define HOMEKEY_RST_EN_SHIFT 5 > +#define RST_DU_MASK 0x3 > +#define RST_DU_SHIFT 8 > + > +#define PMIC_PWRKEY_INDEX 0 > +#define PMIC_HOMEKEY_INDEX 1 > +#define PMIC_MAX_KEY_COUNT 2 #define MTK_PMIC_* > +struct pmic_keys_regs { struct mtk_pmic_keys_regs > + u32 deb_reg; > + u32 deb_mask; > + u32 intsel_reg; > + u32 intsel_mask; > +}; > + > +#define PMIC_KEYS_REGS(_deb_reg, _deb_mask, _intsel_reg, _intsel_mask) \ MTK_PMIC_KEYS_REGS > +{ \ > + .deb_reg = _deb_reg, \ > + .deb_mask = _deb_mask, \ > + .intsel_reg = _intsel_reg, \ > + .intsel_mask = _intsel_mask, \ > +} > + > +struct pmic_regs { mtk_pmic_regs and so on... you got the point. Andi