From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthijs van Duin Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: bus: Minimal TI sysc interconnect target module binding Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:03:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20170925070345.2uraikhswru77rm4@squirrel.local> References: <20170920224621.16236-1-tony@atomide.com> <20170920224621.16236-2-tony@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170920224621.16236-2-tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Cousson , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Laurent Pinchart , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Mark Rutland , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Nishanth Menon , Paul Walmsley , Peter Ujfalusi , Rob Herring , Sakari Ailus , Tero Kristo , Tomi Valkeinen List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 03:46:12PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > TI sysc interconnect target module hardware is independent of the > interconnect. It is used at least with TI L3 interconnect (Arteris NoC) > and TI L4 interconnect (Sonics s3220). This is because the interface between interconnect and module is standardized (Open Core Protocol), so it doesn't really matter which interconnect technology is used. Also, afaik sysc mostly just concerns the interaction between module and PRCM. The only role the interconnect plays here is that it participates in the OCP Disconnect Protocol to allow the module to safely disconnect itself when it or the interconnect enters idle state. Matthijs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html