Re: [PATCH] mtd: powernv: Support MTD_NO_ERASE

[Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>]

On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:11:33 +1100
Stewart Smith <stewart-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> writes:
> > I'd prefer they be documented in the kernel especially if they are
> > used by the kernel. Of course, there's IBM bindings covered by various
> > ?PAPR specs which wouldn't make sense to duplicate, but I'm guessing
> > what's documented in skiboot are not covered by those specs.  
> 
> Correct.
> 
> I don't have an objection to docs being in both places, as long as we
> could keep both in sync. Would suitable comments in the RST doc files
> pointing to the skiboot repo as the canonical copy work?

Rob, any opinion on that?

> 
> I'd like to be able to just diff a subtree of kernel and skiboot to see
> if the docs have diverged.
> 
> We may also need to think of a way to ensure that any of that moving
> back/forth of edits is done in a way that makes licensing sense too
> (skiboot is Apache 2.0)
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html