From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Brezillon Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: powernv: Support MTD_NO_ERASE Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:48:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20171030094829.63730a19@bbrezillon> References: <20170905202339.20732-1-wak@google.com> <20170921095930.4b473f91@bbrezillon> <8760cbv090.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <20171016175517.264e710a@bbrezillon> <87k1zt82gq.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87k1zt82gq.fsf-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stewart Smith , Rob Herring Cc: Mark Rutland , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Michael Ellerman , "linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , Cyril Bur , William Kennington List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:11:33 +1100 Stewart Smith wrote: > Rob Herring writes: > > I'd prefer they be documented in the kernel especially if they are > > used by the kernel. Of course, there's IBM bindings covered by various > > ?PAPR specs which wouldn't make sense to duplicate, but I'm guessing > > what's documented in skiboot are not covered by those specs. > > Correct. > > I don't have an objection to docs being in both places, as long as we > could keep both in sync. Would suitable comments in the RST doc files > pointing to the skiboot repo as the canonical copy work? Rob, any opinion on that? > > I'd like to be able to just diff a subtree of kernel and skiboot to see > if the docs have diverged. > > We may also need to think of a way to ensure that any of that moving > back/forth of edits is done in a way that makes licensing sense too > (skiboot is Apache 2.0) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html