From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
To: Adam Wallis <awallis-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Mathias Nyman
<mathias.nyman-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Matthias Brugger
<matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
chunfeng.yun-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
timur-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] usb: xhci: allow imod-interval to be configurable
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:35:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171128193500.GA30609@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1511889106-9239-1-git-send-email-awallis-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:11:46PM -0500, Adam Wallis wrote:
> The xHCI driver currently has the IMOD set to 160, which
> translates to an IMOD interval of 40,000ns (160 * 250)ns
>
> Commit 0cbd4b34cda9 ("xhci: mediatek: support MTK xHCI host controller")
> introduced a QUIRK for the MTK platform to adjust this interval to 20,
> which translates to an IMOD interval of 5,000ns (20 * 250)ns. This is
> due to the fact that the MTK controller IMOD interval is 8 times
> as much as defined in xHCI spec.
>
> Instead of adding more quirk bits for additional platforms, this patch
> introduces the ability for vendors to set the IMOD_INTERVAL as is
> optimal for their platform. By using device_property_read_u32() on
> "imod-interval", the IMOD INTERVAL can be specified in nano seconds. If
> no interval is specified, the default of 40,000ns (IMOD=160) will be
> used.
>
> No bounds checking has been implemented due to the fact that a vendor
> may have violated the spec and would need to specify a value outside of
> the max 8,000 IRQs/second limit specified in the xHCI spec.
>
> Backwards compatibility is maintained for MTK_HOSTS through the quirk
> bit, however, imod_interval should be pushed into device tree at a
> future point and this quirk should be removed from xhci_plat_probe
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Wallis <awallis-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.txt | 1 +
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 7 ++-----
> drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.txt
> index ae6e484..3998459 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.txt
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ Optional properties:
> - usb2-lpm-disable: indicate if we don't want to enable USB2 HW LPM
> - usb3-lpm-capable: determines if platform is USB3 LPM capable
> - quirk-broken-port-ped: set if the controller has broken port disable mechanism
> + - imod-interval: IMOD_INTERVAL in nano-seconds. Default is 40000
>
> Example:
> usb@f0931000 {
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
> index 09f164f..f7730c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include "xhci-plat.h"
> #include "xhci-mvebu.h"
> #include "xhci-rcar.h"
> +#include "xhci-mtk.h"
>
> static struct hc_driver __read_mostly xhci_plat_hc_driver;
>
> @@ -269,6 +270,20 @@ static int xhci_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "quirk-broken-port-ped"))
> xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_PORT_PED;
>
> + /* imod interval in nanoseconds */
> + if (device_property_read_u32(sysdev,
> + "imod-interval", &xhci->imod_interval))
> + xhci->imod_interval = 40000;
So no matter what value you read, you set it to 40000? Or am I reading
this code incorrectly?
There's a good reason putting function calls inside if() is considered a
bad coding style :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-28 17:11 [PATCH v1] usb: xhci: allow imod-interval to be configurable Adam Wallis
[not found] ` <1511889106-9239-1-git-send-email-awallis-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-28 19:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
[not found] ` <20171128193500.GA30609-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-28 20:32 ` Adam Wallis
[not found] ` <22b57b69-3728-d879-42c6-92e87e7c7955-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-29 8:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
[not found] ` <20171129080941.GA2319-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-01 2:01 ` Rob Herring
2017-12-01 2:02 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171128193500.GA30609@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh-hqyy1w1ycw8ekmwlsbkhg0b+6bgklq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=awallis-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=chunfeng.yun-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=timur-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).