From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset: ti-rstctrl: use the reset-simple driver Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:55:51 -0800 Message-ID: <20180120005551.GC4180@atomide.com> References: <20180116011159.1386-1-tony@atomide.com> <1516095054.9022.1.camel@pengutronix.de> <20180116150314.GC4042@atomide.com> <20180116232243.GD4042@atomide.com> <10dab35c-9c79-5a77-0654-1e99621e4c0f@ti.com> <20180119213310.GA4180@atomide.com> <06882c43-d689-2b85-a1c4-ae4e13a73046@ti.com> <20180119234938.GB4180@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Suman Anna Cc: Philipp Zabel , Philipp Zabel , Paul Parsons , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Dave Gerlach , Mark Rutland , Nishant Menon , Rob Herring , Tero Kristo List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Suman Anna [180120 00:43]: > On 01/19/2018 05:49 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Suman Anna [180119 23:30]: > >> On 01/19/2018 03:33 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>> OK let's do some tests on that, I'll take a look at doing a dts > >>> file over next few weeks. > >> > >> You can look up the patches folder in the above repo, there are some > >> example nodes there already, they are rather straight-forward. > > > > Just for reference, here's what I played with but keep getting > > -EPROBE_DEFER somewhere during init. > > Hmm, What's the baseline branch you are using - mainline, linux-next or > your for-next? I just quickly tested with Linux next + my yet to be posted patches.. I'll debug it further. > > prm: prm@6000 { > > ... > > ranges = <0 0x6000 0x3000>; > > > > prm_dsp: prm@400 { > > compatible = "simple-bus"; > > #address-cells = <1>; > > #size-cells = <1>; > > ranges = <0 0x400 0x100>; > > > > dsp_rstctrl: rstctrl@10 { > > compatible = "ti,rstctrl"; > > reg = <0x10 0x4>; > > #reset-cells = <1>; > > }; > > }; > > ... > > }; > > > > target-module@4a066000 { > > compatible = "ti,sysc-omap2", "ti,sysc"; > > ti,hwmods = "mmu_dsp"; > > reg = <0x4a066000 0x4>, > > <0x4a066010 0x4>, > > <0x4a066014 0x4>; > > reg-names = "rev", "sysc", "syss"; > > ti,sysc-mask = <(SYSC_OMAP2_CLOCKACTIVITY | > > SYSC_OMAP2_SOFTRESET | > > SYSC_OMAP2_AUTOIDLE)>; > > ti,sysc-sidle = , > > , > > ; > > clocks = <&tesla_clkctrl OMAP4_DSP_CLKCTRL 0>; > > clock-names = "fck"; > > resets = <&dsp_rstctrl 1>, > > <&dsp_rstctrl 0>; > > reset-names = "rst2", "rst1"; > > We definitely do not want the two resets here for sure, as the rst2 > belongs to the dsp core (I believe it would be a sibling node to mmu_dsp > here), and cannot be released from reset without programming the MMU and > loading the code. OK thanks, I'll give that a try next week at some point. Regards, Tony