From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [Query] thermal: Who is using "cooling-{min|max}-level}" properties ? Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:22:42 +0530 Message-ID: <20180212085242.GQ28462@vireshk-i7> References: <20180207065959.GN28462@vireshk-i7> <20180207102446.GS28462@vireshk-i7> <11fbba25-7029-8a13-476e-ea2f2de6fbf9@linaro.org> <20180209064211.GY28462@vireshk-i7> <539699c7-9509-dea2-2b31-c5f6749c99c4@linaro.org> <20180209092421.GL28462@vireshk-i7> <5722441d-c8be-4d29-fab7-28b4e5716961@linaro.org> <20180212061015.GO28462@vireshk-i7> <0b73e1aa-a88f-fe4b-b33a-0f589000e148@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0b73e1aa-a88f-fe4b-b33a-0f589000e148@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin , Vincent Guittot , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Punit.Agrawal@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12-02-18, 09:39, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 12/02/2018 07:10, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 09-02-18, 13:14, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> Putting apart the device binding changes discussion for the moment. Why > >> not register the cpufreq driver in all the cases and then drop > > > > s/cpufreq driver/cpufreq cooling driver/ ?? > > yes. > > >> cooling-cells ? So when the opps are present, its registers in the > >> cpufreq->ready callback. > > > > How will someone tell if they don't need the cooling infrastructure ? > > Specially for multiplatform thing. > > They don't define a cooling device in the DT ? Sorry but I am getting a bit confused on what you are suggesting. Maybe you need to rephrase it once more for me, from the very beginning :) -- viresh