From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "A . s . Dong" <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-imx@nxp.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: imx: add fractional PLL output clock
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:55:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180223065540.GO3217@dragon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180201175412.9480-2-l.stach@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 06:54:10PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> This is a new clock type introduced on i.MX8.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-frac-pll.c | 229 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 3 +
> 3 files changed, 233 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/imx/clk-frac-pll.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> index f91f2b2e11cd..9892ae63539c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ obj-y += \
> clk-cpu.o \
> clk-fixup-div.o \
> clk-fixup-mux.o \
> + clk-frac-pll.o \
> clk-gate-exclusive.o \
> clk-gate2.o \
> clk-pllv1.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-frac-pll.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-frac-pll.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..30736d53dfbe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-frac-pll.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2017 NXP.
> + *
> + * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public
> + * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * Version 2 or later at the following locations:
> + *
> + * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.html
> + * http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
The SPDX tag is being used for include/dt-bindings/clock/imx8mq-clock.h.
It may be good for all clock driver new files as well?
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
Sort them alphabetically?
> +
> +#include "clk.h"
> +
> +#define PLL_CFG0 0x0
> +#define PLL_CFG1 0x4
> +
> +#define PLL_LOCK_STATUS (0x1 << 31)
> +#define PLL_CLKE 21
Unused define?
> +#define PLL_PD 19
> +#define PLL_BYPASS 14
> +#define PLL_NEWDIV_VAL (1 << 12)
> +#define PLL_NEWDIV_ACK (1 << 11)
0x1 in PLL_LOCK_STATUS and 1 here lack consistency. Maybe BIT() even
better?
> +#define PLL_FRAC_DIV_MASK 0xffffff
> +#define PLL_INT_DIV_MASK 0x7f
> +#define PLL_FRAC_DENOM 0x1000000
Can we make the indentation of all these defines consistent?
> +
> +struct clk_frac_pll {
> + struct clk_hw hw;
> + void __iomem *base;
> +};
> +
> +#define to_clk_frac_pll(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct clk_frac_pll, hw)
> +
> +static int clk_wait_lock(struct clk_frac_pll *pll)
> +{
> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(10);
> +
> + /* Wait for PLL to lock */
> + do {
> + if (readl_relaxed(pll->base) & PLL_LOCK_STATUS)
> + break;
> + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
> + break;
> + } while (1);
> +
> + return readl_relaxed(pll->base) & PLL_LOCK_STATUS ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
> +}
> +
> +static int clk_wait_ack(struct clk_frac_pll *pll)
> +{
> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(50);
> +
> + /* return directly if the pll is in powerdown or in bypass */
> + if (readl_relaxed(pll->base) & ((1 << PLL_PD) | (1 << PLL_BYPASS)))
Instead of bit shift, it seems that defining PLL_PD and PLL_BYPASS as
bit mask will make the code a bit simpler.
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Wait for the pll's divfi and divff to be reloaded */
> + do {
> + if (readl_relaxed(pll->base) & PLL_NEWDIV_ACK)
> + break;
> + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
> + break;
> + } while (1);
> +
> + return readl_relaxed(pll->base) & PLL_NEWDIV_ACK ? 0 : ETIMEDOUT;
> +}
> +
> +static int clk_pll_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct clk_frac_pll *pll = to_clk_frac_pll(hw);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> + val &= ~(1 << PLL_PD);
> + writel_relaxed(val, pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> +
> + return clk_wait_lock(pll);
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_pll_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct clk_frac_pll *pll = to_clk_frac_pll(hw);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> + val |= (1 << PLL_PD);
> + writel_relaxed(val, pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> +}
> +
> +static int clk_pll_is_prepared(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct clk_frac_pll *pll = to_clk_frac_pll(hw);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> + return (val & (1 << PLL_PD)) ? 0 : 1;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long clk_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_frac_pll *pll = to_clk_frac_pll(hw);
> + u32 val, divff, divfi, divq;
> + u64 temp64;
> +
> + val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> + divq = ((val & 0x1f) + 1) * 2;
> + val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG1);
> + divff = (val >> 7) & PLL_FRAC_DIV_MASK;
> + divfi = (val & PLL_INT_DIV_MASK);
> +
> + temp64 = (u64)parent_rate * 8;
> + temp64 *= divff;
> + do_div(temp64, PLL_FRAC_DENOM);
> + temp64 /= divq;
> +
> + return parent_rate * 8 * (divfi + 1) / divq + (unsigned long)temp64;
> +}
> +
> +static long clk_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *prate)
> +{
> + u32 divff, divfi;
> + u64 temp64;
> + unsigned long parent_rate = *prate;
> +
> + parent_rate *= 8;
> + rate *= 2;
> + divfi = rate / parent_rate;
> + temp64 = (u64)(rate - divfi * parent_rate);
> + temp64 *= PLL_FRAC_DENOM;
> + do_div(temp64, parent_rate);
> + divff = temp64;
> +
> + temp64 = (u64)parent_rate;
> + temp64 *= divff;
> + do_div(temp64, PLL_FRAC_DENOM);
> +
> + return (parent_rate * divfi + (unsigned long)temp64) / 2;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * To simplify the clock calculation, we can keep the 'PLL_OUTPUT_VAL' at zero
> + * (means the PLL output will be divided by 2). So the PLL output can use
> + * the below formula:
> + * pllout = parent_rate * 8 / 2 * DIVF_VAL;
> + * where DIVF_VAL = 1 + DIVFI + DIVFF / 2^24.
> + */
> +static int clk_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_frac_pll *pll = to_clk_frac_pll(hw);
> + u32 val, divfi, divff;
> + u64 temp64;
> + int ret;
> +
> + parent_rate *= 8;
> + rate *= 2;
> + divfi = rate / parent_rate;
> + temp64 = (u64) (rate - divfi * parent_rate);
> + temp64 *= PLL_FRAC_DENOM;
> + do_div(temp64, parent_rate);
> + divff = temp64;
> +
> + val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG1);
> + val &= ~((PLL_FRAC_DIV_MASK << 7) | (PLL_INT_DIV_MASK));
> + val |= ((divff << 7) | (divfi - 1));
val |= (divff << 7) | (divfi - 1);
Shawn
> + writel_relaxed(val, pll->base + PLL_CFG1);
> +
> + val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> + val &= ~0x1f;
> + writel_relaxed(val, pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> +
> + /* Set the NEV_DIV_VAL to reload the DIVFI and DIVFF */
> + val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> + val |= PLL_NEWDIV_VAL;
> + writel_relaxed(val, pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> +
> + ret = clk_wait_ack(pll);
> +
> + /* clear the NEV_DIV_VAL */
> + val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> + val &= ~PLL_NEWDIV_VAL;
> + writel_relaxed(val, pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops clk_frac_pll_ops = {
> + .prepare = clk_pll_prepare,
> + .unprepare = clk_pll_unprepare,
> + .is_prepared = clk_pll_is_prepared,
> + .recalc_rate = clk_pll_recalc_rate,
> + .round_rate = clk_pll_round_rate,
> + .set_rate = clk_pll_set_rate,
> +};
> +
> +struct clk *imx_clk_frac_pll(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> + void __iomem *base)
> +{
> + struct clk_frac_pll *pll;
> + struct clk *clk;
> + struct clk_init_data init;
> +
> + pll = kzalloc(sizeof(*pll), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pll)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + pll->base = base;
> + init.name = name;
> + init.ops = &clk_frac_pll_ops;
> + init.flags = 0;
> + init.parent_names = &parent_name;
> + init.num_parents = 1;
> +
> + pll->hw.init = &init;
> +
> + clk = clk_register(NULL, &pll->hw);
> + if (IS_ERR(clk))
> + kfree(pll);
> +
> + return clk;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> index d69c4bbf3597..287610902ea8 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ struct clk *imx_clk_pllv1(enum imx_pllv1_type type, const char *name,
> struct clk *imx_clk_pllv2(const char *name, const char *parent,
> void __iomem *base);
>
> +struct clk *imx_clk_frac_pll(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> + void __iomem *base);
> +
> enum imx_pllv3_type {
> IMX_PLLV3_GENERIC,
> IMX_PLLV3_SYS,
> --
> 2.15.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-23 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-01 17:54 [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: add binding for i.MX8MQ CCM Lucas Stach
2018-02-01 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: imx: add fractional PLL output clock Lucas Stach
2018-02-23 6:55 ` Shawn Guo [this message]
2018-02-28 10:14 ` Dong Aisheng
[not found] ` <20180201175412.9480-1-l.stach-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-01 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: imx: add SCCG PLL type Lucas Stach
2018-02-23 8:46 ` Shawn Guo
2018-02-28 12:03 ` Dong Aisheng
2018-02-12 13:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: add binding for i.MX8MQ CCM Shawn Guo
2018-02-01 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] clk: imx: add clock driver " Lucas Stach
2018-02-23 9:20 ` Shawn Guo
2018-02-24 3:54 ` Shawn Guo
2018-02-28 12:23 ` Dong Aisheng
2018-03-15 21:33 ` Sascha Hauer
2018-03-16 10:10 ` Lucas Stach
2018-03-16 10:29 ` A.s. Dong
2018-02-22 3:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: add binding " Shawn Guo
2018-02-22 14:12 ` Shawn Guo
2018-02-23 9:29 ` Shawn Guo
2018-02-23 4:05 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180223065540.GO3217@dragon \
--to=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).