From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:43066 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1033767AbeCASL0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2018 13:11:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 18:11:19 +0000 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add power control for pcie-histb driver Message-ID: <20180301181119.GA5674@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1516722337-1533-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20180301012241.GA28619@dragon> <20180301150822.GA13722@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180301150822.GA13722@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Shawn Guo , Bjorn Helgaas , Rob Herring , Fabio Estevam , Jianguo Sun , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jiancheng Xue List-ID: On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:08:22AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Lorenzo] > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:22:46AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:45:35PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > The first patch is a small fix which is useful for the second one. > > > This version basically follows Fabio's suggestion to reimplement the > > > first version patch, using a regulator that can be backed by GPIO to > > > control the power to PCIe port. > > > > > > Shawn Guo (2): > > > PCI: histb: fix error path of histb_pcie_host_enable() > > > PCI: histb: add an optional regulator for PCIe port power control > > > > > > .../bindings/pci/hisilicon-histb-pcie.txt | 1 + > > > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-histb.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---- > > > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > Did you get a chance to look at the series? > > I cc'd Lorenzo, who is now taking care of this area. > > If/when you repost this, please incorporate Rob's ack and capitalize > the first word of your summary ("Fix", "Add") to match the drivers/pci > convention. > > Also, the original post used "PCI: hisi:", but here you use > "PCI: histb:". It probably does make sense to distinguish > "hisi" from "histb", but I want it to be a conscious choice > so future patches can be consistent with it. I suspect that using histb makes more sense but I will wait Shawn's feedback on this, this series was on my radar anyway but thanks for the flag up. Lorenzo