From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:29:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180305152903.0000417e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519403030-21189-7-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:23:36 +0000
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> The performance protocol is intended for the performance management of
> group(s) of device(s) that run in the same performance domain. It
> includes even the CPUs. A performance domain is defined by a set of
> devices that always have to run at the same performance level.
> For example, a set of CPUs that share a voltage domain, and have a
> common frequency control, is said to be in the same performance domain.
>
> The commands in this protocol provide functionality to describe the
> protocol version, describe various attribute flags, set and get the
> performance level of a domain. It also supports discovery of the list
> of performance levels supported by a performance domain, and the
> properties of each performance level.
>
<snip>
> +
> +static int scmi_perf_attributes_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
> + struct scmi_perf_info *pi)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct scmi_xfer *t;
> + struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_attributes *attr;
> +
> + ret = scmi_one_xfer_init(handle, PROTOCOL_ATTRIBUTES,
> + SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, 0, sizeof(*attr), &t);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + attr = t->rx.buf;
> +
> + ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
> + if (!ret) {
Use a goto for the error path rather than indenting all this good path stuff.
The same would help readability in various other places.
> + u16 flags = le16_to_cpu(attr->flags);
> +
> + pi->num_domains = le16_to_cpu(attr->num_domains);
> + pi->power_scale_mw = POWER_SCALE_IN_MILLIWATT(flags);
> + pi->stats_addr = le32_to_cpu(attr->stats_addr_low) |
> + (u64)le32_to_cpu(attr->stats_addr_high) << 32;
> + pi->stats_size = le32_to_cpu(attr->stats_size);
> + }
> +
> + scmi_one_xfer_put(handle, t);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
...
> +
> +static struct scmi_perf_ops perf_ops = {
> + .limits_set = scmi_perf_limits_set,
> + .limits_get = scmi_perf_limits_get,
> + .level_set = scmi_perf_level_set,
> + .level_get = scmi_perf_level_get,
> + .device_domain_id = scmi_dev_domain_id,
> + .get_transition_latency = scmi_dvfs_get_transition_latency,
> + .add_opps_to_device = scmi_dvfs_add_opps_to_device,
> + .freq_set = scmi_dvfs_freq_set,
> + .freq_get = scmi_dvfs_freq_get,
> +};
> +
> +static int scmi_perf_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *handle)
> +{
> + int domain;
> + u32 version;
> + struct scmi_perf_info *pinfo;
> +
> + scmi_version_get(handle, SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, &version);
> +
> + dev_dbg(handle->dev, "Performance Version %d.%d\n",
> + PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(version), PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR(version));
> +
> + pinfo = devm_kzalloc(handle->dev, sizeof(*pinfo), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pinfo)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + scmi_perf_attributes_get(handle, pinfo);
> +
> + pinfo->dom_info = devm_kcalloc(handle->dev, pinfo->num_domains,
> + sizeof(*pinfo->dom_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pinfo->dom_info)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (domain = 0; domain < pinfo->num_domains; domain++) {
> + struct perf_dom_info *dom = pinfo->dom_info + domain;
> +
> + scmi_perf_domain_attributes_get(handle, domain, dom);
> + scmi_perf_describe_levels_get(handle, domain, dom);
> + }
> +
> + handle->perf_ops = &perf_ops;
> + handle->perf_priv = pinfo;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init scmi_perf_init(void)
> +{
> + return scmi_protocol_register(SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF,
> + &scmi_perf_protocol_init);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(scmi_perf_init);
> diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> index db995126134d..d80f4c9a0fad 100644
> --- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> @@ -44,15 +44,57 @@ struct scmi_revision_info {
> char sub_vendor_id[SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE];
> };
>
> +struct scmi_handle;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct scmi_perf_ops - represents the various operations provided
> + * by SCMI Performance Protocol
> + *
> + * @limits_set: sets limits on the performance level of a domain
> + * @limits_get: gets limits on the performance level of a domain
> + * @level_set: sets the performance level of a domain
> + * @level_get: gets the performance level of a domain
> + * @device_domain_id: gets the scmi domain id for a given device
> + * @get_transition_latency: gets the DVFS transition latency for a given device
> + * @add_opps_to_device: adds all the OPPs for a given device
> + * @freq_set: sets the frequency for a given device using sustained frequency
> + * to sustained performance level mapping
> + * @freq_get: gets the frequency for a given device using sustained frequency
> + * to sustained performance level mapping
> + */
> +struct scmi_perf_ops {
> + int (*limits_set)(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> + u32 max_perf, u32 min_perf);
> + int (*limits_get)(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> + u32 *max_perf, u32 *min_perf);
> + int (*level_set)(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> + u32 level);
> + int (*level_get)(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> + u32 *level);
> + int (*device_domain_id)(struct device *dev);
> + int (*get_transition_latency)(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
> + struct device *dev);
Naming consistency would improve this.
transition_latency_get for example.
> + int (*add_opps_to_device)(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
> + struct device *dev);
> + int (*freq_set)(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> + unsigned long rate);
> + int (*freq_get)(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> + unsigned long *rate);
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct scmi_handle - Handle returned to ARM SCMI clients for usage.
> *
> * @dev: pointer to the SCMI device
> * @version: pointer to the structure containing SCMI version information
> + * @perf_ops: pointer to set of performance protocol operations
> */
> struct scmi_handle {
> struct device *dev;
> struct scmi_revision_info *version;
> + struct scmi_perf_ops *perf_ops;
> + /* for protocol internal use */
> + void *perf_priv;
> };
>
> enum scmi_std_protocol {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-05 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-23 16:23 [PATCH v6 00/20] firmware: ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI) support Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 01/20] dt-bindings: mailbox: add support for mailbox client shared memory Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 02/20] dt-bindings: arm: add support for ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI) protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 03/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add basic driver infrastructure for SCMI Sudeep Holla
2018-02-26 15:57 ` Philippe Ombredanne
2018-02-26 17:10 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 13:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-03-05 14:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 14:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 04/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 14:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 05/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add scmi protocol bus to enumerate protocol devices Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 14:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 06/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 14:29 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 07/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 08/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for power protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 09/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for sensor protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 10/20] firmware: arm_scmi: probe and initialise all the supported protocols Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 11/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add support for polling based SCMI transfers Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 12/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add option for polling based performance domain operations Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 13/20] firmware: arm_scmi: refactor in preparation to support per-protocol channels Sudeep Holla
2018-03-05 14:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-03-05 14:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 14/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add per-protocol channels support using idr objects Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 15/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add device power domain support using genpd Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 16/20] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCMI Sudeep Holla
2018-03-16 23:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-03-20 12:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-03-20 16:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 17/20] hwmon: (core) Add hwmon_max to hwmon_sensor_types enumeration Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 18/20] hwmon: add support for sensors exported via ARM SCMI Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 19/20] cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol Sudeep Holla
2018-02-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v6 20/20] cpufreq: scmi: add support for fast frequency switching Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180305152903.0000417e@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=klimov.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).