From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] [PATCH 2/8] Documentations: dt-bindings: Add a document of PECI adapter driver for Aspeed AST24xx/25xx SoCs Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 14:05:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20180306130551.GA16061@amd> References: <20180221161606.32247-1-jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com> <20180221161606.32247-3-jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com> <20180306124002.GA13950@amd> <20180306125416.GD26143@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180306125416.GD26143@lunn.ch> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Jae Hyun Yoo , joel@jms.id.au, andrew@aj.id.au, arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jdelvare@suse.com, linux@roeck-us.net, benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue 2018-03-06 13:54:16, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 01:40:02PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/peci/peci-aspeed.txt | 73 ++++++++++++= ++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/peci/peci-aspee= d.txt > > >=20 > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/peci/peci-aspeed.txt b= /Documentation/devicetree/bindings/peci/peci-aspeed.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..8a86f346d550 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/peci/peci-aspeed.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ > > > +Device tree configuration for PECI buses on the AST24XX and AST25XX = SoCs. > >=20 > > Are these SoCs x86-based? >=20 > ARM, as far as i can tell. If i get the architecture correct, these > are BMC, Board Management Controllers, looking after the main x86 CPU, > stopping it overheating, controlling the power supplies, remote > management, etc. Ok, so with x86 machine, I get arm-based one for free. I get it. Is user able to run his own kernel on the arm system, or is it locked down, TiVo style? Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlqeki8ACgkQMOfwapXb+vLqygCglPEZOOQBA5q0Fn16vyQbhxrU F6IAoI4+SNEpv1QvK+tYZlnVkaev34y6 =AFs6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7--