From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
Hanna Hawa <hannah@marvell.com>, Omri Itach <omrii@marvell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Igal Liberman <igall@marvell.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Shadi Ammouri <shadi@marvell.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: nand: marvell: Fix clock resource by adding a register clock
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 20:44:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180307204418.014622b8@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180307161316.14612-1-gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
+Rob and the DT ML for the DT bindings changes.
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 17:13:16 +0100
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com> wrote:
> On Armada 7K/8K we need to explicitly enable the register clock. This
> clock is optional because not all the SoCs using this IP need it but at
> least for Armada 7K/8K it is actually mandatory.
>
> The binding documentation is updated accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v1-> v2
>
> - Removed the unnecessary IS_ERR() call
> - Skip the reg clock only if it is not present by checking "-ENOENT"
> - Add a label for uninitializing the reg clock.
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/marvell-nand.txt | 6 +++++-
> drivers/mtd/nand/marvell_nand.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/marvell-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/marvell-nand.txt
> index c08fb477b3c6..4ee9813bf88f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/marvell-nand.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/marvell-nand.txt
> @@ -14,7 +14,11 @@ Required properties:
> - #address-cells: shall be set to 1. Encode the NAND CS.
> - #size-cells: shall be set to 0.
> - interrupts: shall define the NAND controller interrupt.
> -- clocks: shall reference the NAND controller clock.
> +- clocks: shall reference the NAND controller clocks, the second one is
> + optional but needed for the Armada 7K/8K SoCs
> +- clock-names: mandatory if there is a second clock, in this case the
> + name must be "core" for the first clock and "reg" for the second
> + one
Still think we should not enforce the order, and I proposed a simple
solution for that in my previous review:
nfc->ecc_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
if (PTR_ERR(nfc->ecc_clk) == -ENOENT)
nfc->ecc_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(nfc->ecc_clk))
return PTR_ERR(nfc->ecc_clk);
> - marvell,system-controller: Set to retrieve the syscon node that handles
> NAND controller related registers (only required with the
> "marvell,armada-8k-nand[-controller]" compatibles).
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/marvell_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/marvell_nand.c
> index 2196f2a233d6..072e23635375 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/marvell_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/marvell_nand.c
> @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ struct marvell_nfc {
> struct device *dev;
> void __iomem *regs;
> struct clk *ecc_clk;
> + struct clk *reg_clk;
There's a kernel-doc header describing the marvell_nfc fields, could
you add an entry for reg_clk?
> struct completion complete;
> unsigned long assigned_cs;
> struct list_head chips;
> @@ -2747,12 +2748,24 @@ static int marvell_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + nfc->reg_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "reg");
> + if (PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk) != -ENOENT) {
> + if (!IS_ERR(nfc->reg_clk)) {
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->reg_clk);
> + if (ret)
> + goto unprepare_clk;
I already suggested to move the devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "reg") before
the clk_prepare_enable(nfc->ecc_clk) one to simplify the error path.
> + } else {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk);
> + goto unprepare_clk;
> + }
> + }
So nfc->reg_clk stays assigned to -ENOENT if the clk is not present, and
clk_disable_unprepare() will manipulate an invalid pointer when called
from the error or ->remove() path.
Could be addressed/simplified with something like that:
/*
* The register clk is only required on armada 8k. By assigning
* ->reg_clk to NULL when -ENOENT is returned, we make sure all
* clk_prepare_enable()/clk_disable_unprepare() calls work
* correctly even if the clk is missing.
*/
nfc->reg_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "reg");
if (PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk) == -ENOENT)
nfc->reg_clk = NULL;
if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_clk))
return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk);
...
ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->reg_clk);
if (ret)
goto unprepare_ecc_clk;
> +
> marvell_nfc_disable_int(nfc, NDCR_ALL_INT);
> marvell_nfc_clear_int(nfc, NDCR_ALL_INT);
> ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, marvell_nfc_isr,
> 0, "marvell-nfc", nfc);
> if (ret)
> - goto unprepare_clk;
> + goto unprepare_clk_reg;
>
> /* Get NAND controller capabilities */
> if (pdev->id_entry)
> @@ -2763,22 +2776,24 @@ static int marvell_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!nfc->caps) {
> dev_err(dev, "Could not retrieve NFC caps\n");
> ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto unprepare_clk;
> + goto unprepare_clk_reg;
> }
>
> /* Init the controller and then probe the chips */
> ret = marvell_nfc_init(nfc);
> if (ret)
> - goto unprepare_clk;
> + goto unprepare_clk_reg;
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, nfc);
>
> ret = marvell_nand_chips_init(dev, nfc);
> if (ret)
> - goto unprepare_clk;
> + goto unprepare_clk_reg;
>
> return 0;
>
> +unprepare_clk_reg:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->reg_clk);
> unprepare_clk:
Please rename the label (unprepare_clk -> unprepare_ecc_clk).
> clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->ecc_clk);
>
> @@ -2796,6 +2811,7 @@ static int marvell_nfc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dma_release_channel(nfc->dma_chan);
> }
>
> + clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->reg_clk);
> clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->ecc_clk);
>
> return 0;
--
Boris Brezillon, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-07 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20180307161316.14612-1-gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
2018-03-07 19:44 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-03-12 16:55 ` [PATCH v2] mtd: nand: marvell: Fix clock resource by adding a register clock Gregory CLEMENT
2018-03-12 19:35 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-03-13 10:29 ` Gregory CLEMENT
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180307204418.014622b8@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=hannah@marvell.com \
--cc=igall@marvell.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=omrii@marvell.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=shadi@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).