From: jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
architt@codeaurora.org, Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
airlied@linux.ie, horms@verge.net.au, magnus.damm@gmail.com,
geert@linux-m68k.org, niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se,
sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm: Add LVDS decoder bridge
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:30:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180312123042.GA12967@w540> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81b25fde-63fa-aacc-1bf4-f2a7b60b19ef@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4404 bytes --]
Hi Andrzej,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:07:27AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 09.03.2018 14:51, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Hello,
> > after some discussion on the proposed bindings for generic lvds decoder and
> > Thine THC63LVD1024, I decided to drop the THC63 specific part and just live with
> > a transparent decoder that does not support any configuration from DT.
> >
> > Dropping THC63 support to avoid discussion on how to better implement support
> > for a DRM bridge with 2 input ports and focus on LVDS mode propagation through
> > bridges as explained in v1 cover letter (for DRM people: please see [1] as why
> > I find difficult to implement support for bridges with multiple input endpoints)
> >
> > Same base branch as v1, with same patches for V3M Eagle applied on top.
> > git://jmondi.org/linux v3m/v4.16-rc3/base
> >
> > Thanks
> > j
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - Drop support for THC63LVD1024
> >
> > [1] I had a quick at how to model a DRM bridge with multiple input
> > ports, and I see a blocker in how DRM identifies and matches bridges using
> > the devices node in place of the endpoint nodes.
> >
> > As THC63LVD1024 supports up to 2 LVDS inputs and 2 LVDS outputs, I see only
> > a few ways to support that:
> > 1) register 2 drm bridges from the same driver (one for each input/output pair)
> > but they would both be matches on the same device node when the preceding
> > bridge calls "of_drm_find_bridge()".
> > 2) register a single bridge with multiple "next bridges", but when the bridge
> > gets attached I don't see a way on how to identify on which next bridge
> > "drm_bridge_attach()" on, as it depends on the endpoint the current bridge
> > has been attached on first, and we don't have that information.
> > 3) Register more instances of the same chip in DTS, one for each input/output
> > pair. They gonna share supplies and gpios, and I don't like that.
> >
> > I had a quick look at the currently in mainline bridges and none of them has
> > multiple input endpoints, except for HDMI audio endpoint, which I haven't found
> > in use in any DTS. I guess the problem has been already debated and maybe solved
> > in the past, so feel free to point me to other sources.
>
> I think this is is a step in wrong direction, IMHO. Your previous
> patchset was quite OK, at least bindings, IMHO. Few things needed only
> polishing.
> Here we have unmanaged/transparent bridge, which is totally different,
> what happened to regulators and gpios from previous iteration.
> I do not have schematics of the board, but I guess respective pins of
> the bridge must be connected somehow.
> I think the problem you want to avoid (double bridge) should not be a
> problem at all.
> I suppose the most important is to have correct bindings - as they need
> to be stable.
> If you really must to do hacks better is to put them into driver.
>
I understand. The "transparent bridge" is of no actual use, but I don't see
how the "double bridge" thing is not an issue if I were to develop
support for the actual Thine chip.
Please see my reply from yesterday to Archit. I still think having two
bridges is somehow an issue...
While we clarify that, would it be fine an initial driver version for
the actualt Thine chip with a single input support[1]? I would ditch this
transparent bridge and resume working on a THC63LVD1024 driver from
comments received on v1.
Thanks
j
[1] Single input support implies a single input port in DT bindings
even if the chip supports two, and my understanding was that you
didn't like this.
> Regards
> Andrzej
>
> >
> > Jacopo Mondi (3):
> > dt-bindings: display: bridge: Document LVDS to parallel decoder
> > drm: bridge: Add LVDS decoder driver
> > arm64: dts: renesas: Add LVDS decoder to R-Car V3M Eagle
> >
> > .../bindings/display/bridge/lvds-decoder.txt | 42 ++++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77970-eagle.dts | 31 +++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 8 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lvds-decoder.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 237 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-decoder.txt
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lvds-decoder.c
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-12 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20180309135207epcas3p32a7d3a0e9c9dae5af8fc855ff3c0e03b@epcas3p3.samsung.com>
2018-03-09 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] drm: Add LVDS decoder bridge Jacopo Mondi
2018-03-09 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: bridge: Document LVDS to parallel decoder Jacopo Mondi
2018-03-09 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm: bridge: Add LVDS decoder driver Jacopo Mondi
2018-03-12 8:26 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-03-20 15:42 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2018-03-09 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: renesas: Add LVDS decoder to R-Car V3M Eagle Jacopo Mondi
2018-03-09 14:49 ` Simon Horman
2018-03-09 17:30 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2018-03-10 17:22 ` jacopo mondi
2018-03-10 5:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] drm: Add LVDS decoder bridge Archit Taneja
2018-03-10 18:00 ` jacopo mondi
2018-03-20 12:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-12 9:07 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-03-12 12:30 ` jacopo mondi [this message]
2018-03-12 13:47 ` Andrzej Hajda
2018-03-12 14:11 ` jacopo mondi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180312123042.GA12967@w540 \
--to=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).