devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/8] reset: modify the way reset lookup works for board files
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:47:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180323114709.20330-2-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180323114709.20330-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>

Commit 7af1bb19f1d7 ("reset: add support for non-DT systems")
introduced reset control lookup mechanism for boards that still use
board files.

The routine used to register lookup entries takes the corresponding
reset_controlled_dev structure as argument.

It's been determined however that for the first user of this new
interface - davinci psc driver - it will be easier to register the
lookup entries using the reset controller device name.

This patch changes the way lookup entries are added.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/reset/core.c             | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/reset-controller.h | 12 +++++++-----
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
index 06fa4907afc4..f4a29c046995 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/core.c
+++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
@@ -153,12 +153,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_reset_controller_register);
 
 /**
  * reset_controller_add_lookup - register a set of lookup entries
- * @rcdev: initialized reset controller device owning the reset line
  * @lookup: array of reset lookup entries
  * @num_entries: number of entries in the lookup array
  */
-void reset_controller_add_lookup(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
-				 struct reset_control_lookup *lookup,
+void reset_controller_add_lookup(struct reset_control_lookup *lookup,
 				 unsigned int num_entries)
 {
 	struct reset_control_lookup *entry;
@@ -168,13 +166,12 @@ void reset_controller_add_lookup(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
 	for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
 		entry = &lookup[i];
 
-		if (!entry->dev_id) {
-			pr_warn("%s(): reset lookup entry has no dev_id, skipping\n",
+		if (!entry->dev_id || !entry->provider) {
+			pr_warn("%s(): reset lookup entry badly specified, skipping\n",
 				__func__);
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		entry->rcdev = rcdev;
 		list_add_tail(&entry->list, &reset_lookup_list);
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&reset_lookup_mutex);
@@ -526,11 +523,30 @@ struct reset_control *__of_reset_control_get(struct device_node *node,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__of_reset_control_get);
 
+static struct reset_controller_dev *
+__reset_controller_by_name(const char *name)
+{
+	struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&reset_list_mutex);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(rcdev, &reset_controller_list, list) {
+		if (!rcdev->dev)
+			continue;
+
+		if (!strcmp(name, dev_name(rcdev->dev)))
+			return rcdev;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 static struct reset_control *
 __reset_control_get_from_lookup(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
 				bool shared, bool optional)
 {
 	const struct reset_control_lookup *lookup;
+	struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev;
 	const char *dev_id = dev_name(dev);
 	struct reset_control *rstc = NULL;
 
@@ -547,7 +563,15 @@ __reset_control_get_from_lookup(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
 		    ((con_id && lookup->con_id) &&
 		     !strcmp(con_id, lookup->con_id))) {
 			mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
-			rstc = __reset_control_get_internal(lookup->rcdev,
+			rcdev = __reset_controller_by_name(lookup->provider);
+			if (!rcdev) {
+				mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
+				mutex_unlock(&reset_lookup_mutex);
+				/* Reset provider may not be ready yet. */
+				return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+			}
+
+			rstc = __reset_control_get_internal(rcdev,
 							    lookup->index,
 							    shared);
 			mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
diff --git a/include/linux/reset-controller.h b/include/linux/reset-controller.h
index 25698f6c1fae..c870acaa2e07 100644
--- a/include/linux/reset-controller.h
+++ b/include/linux/reset-controller.h
@@ -30,21 +30,22 @@ struct of_phandle_args;
  * struct reset_control_lookup - represents a single lookup entry
  *
  * @list: internal list of all reset lookup entries
- * @rcdev: reset controller device controlling this reset line
+ * @provider: name of the reset controller device controlling this reset line
  * @index: ID of the reset controller in the reset controller device
  * @dev_id: name of the device associated with this reset line
  * @con_id name of the reset line (can be NULL)
  */
 struct reset_control_lookup {
 	struct list_head list;
-	struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev;
+	const char *provider;
 	unsigned int index;
 	const char *dev_id;
 	const char *con_id;
 };
 
-#define RESET_LOOKUP(_dev_id, _con_id, _index)				\
+#define RESET_LOOKUP(_provider, _dev_id, _con_id, _index)		\
 	{								\
+		.provider = _provider,					\
 		.dev_id = _dev_id,					\
 		.con_id = _con_id,					\
 		.index = _index,					\
@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct reset_control_lookup {
  * @owner: kernel module of the reset controller driver
  * @list: internal list of reset controller devices
  * @reset_control_head: head of internal list of requested reset controls
+ * @dev: corresponding driver model device struct
  * @of_node: corresponding device tree node as phandle target
  * @of_reset_n_cells: number of cells in reset line specifiers
  * @of_xlate: translation function to translate from specifier as found in the
@@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ struct reset_controller_dev {
 	struct module *owner;
 	struct list_head list;
 	struct list_head reset_control_head;
+	struct device *dev;
 	struct device_node *of_node;
 	int of_reset_n_cells;
 	int (*of_xlate)(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
@@ -82,8 +85,7 @@ struct device;
 int devm_reset_controller_register(struct device *dev,
 				   struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev);
 
-void reset_controller_add_lookup(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
-				 struct reset_control_lookup *lookup,
+void reset_controller_add_lookup(struct reset_control_lookup *lookup,
 				 unsigned int num_entries);
 
 #endif
-- 
2.16.1

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-23 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-23 11:47 [PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-23 11:47 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2018-03-23 12:04   ` [PATCH v3 1/8] reset: modify the way reset lookup works for board files Philipp Zabel
2018-03-23 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ARM: davinci: dts: make psc0 a reset provider Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-23 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ARM: davinci: dts: add a reset control to the dsp node Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-23 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] clk: davinci: add a reset lookup table for psc0 Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-23 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] remoteproc: da8xx: add the missing retval check for clk_enable() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-23 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] remoteproc: da8xx: prepare and unprepare the clock where needed Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-23 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] remoteproc: da8xx: use the reset framework Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-23 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] clk: davinci: kill davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180323114709.20330-2-brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).