Re: [[PATCH v2] 2/2] dt-bindings: clock: Introduce QCOM RPMh clock bindings

[Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>]

On Sun 08 Apr 03:32 PDT 2018, Taniya Das wrote:

> From: Amit Nischal <anischal@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Add RPMh clock device bindings for Qualcomm Technology Inc's SoCs. These
> devices would be used for communicating resource state requests to control
> the clocks managed by RPMh.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Nischal <anischal@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt    | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4ade82b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. RPMh Clocks
> +-------------------------------------------------------
> +
> +Resource Power Manager Hardened (RPMh) manages shared resources on
> +some Qualcomm Technologies Inc. SoCs. It accepts clock requests from
> +other hardware subsystems via RSC to control clocks.
> +
> +Required properties :
> +- compatible : shall contain "qcom,rpmh-clk-sdm845"

We have a chance to fix this to Rob's liking, so please make this
"qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clock" (or maybe "qcom,sdm845-rpmhcc"?)

> +
> +- #clock-cells : must contain 1
> +
> +Example :
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
> +
> +	&apps_rsc {
> +		rpmh: clock-controller {

I believe the clock-controller, the power-domain and the bus-scaler are
equal contenders of the label "rpmh", so please make it more specific.
How about "rpmhcc" to mimic previous platforms?

> +			compatible = "qcom,rpmh-clk-sdm845";
> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> +		};
> +	};

Regards,
Bjorn