Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Cc: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>,
	Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: add unit converter
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:06:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180410130652.d3kk3vo6p4524mid@rob-hp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c18fa2a-0b10-5365-4868-ead6b61b45b2@axentia.se>

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 08:09:08PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-04-03 19:41, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> > On 04/03/2018 10:36 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> This driver implements support for voltage dividers and current
> >> sense circuits. It's pretty generic and should be easily adaptable
> >> to other linear scaling purposes...
> >>
> > 
> > I really like this idea, defining channel scaling / channel type
> > conversion in DT will be very useful. So much so that I would recommend
> > this not be a use specific driver but instead moved into the IIO core.
> > 
> > This would allow defining these channel conversions in the device node
> > itself, so as to not need a separate node just for the converter (the
> > conversion is not a device and probably should not have it's own node
> > anyway). It would also help with enabling this support for buffered
> > readers/writers and not just devices only supporting _raw reads/writes.
> 
> In my case, the voltage dividers and the current sense circuit are very
> much real, and I can point my finger at them on the board. Sure, they
> are not ICs, but to not call them devices is wrong IMHO, and the ADC
> which is involved have very little to do with the voltage dividers and
> the fact that it is involved in sensing current. This is not an argument
> for not moving the functionally to the core though, but that has some
> problems AFAICT. Because you need some kind of clever and generic
> binding to make the core do its thing, and it might not be easy to come
> up with something that fits all devices? And if we do put this in the
> core, that opens the door for more complex unit converters later on
> (non-linear etc), further complicating the generic bindings.

I agree. We've learned the hard way that even things like the LED diode 
itself need to be described and not just the controller.

Rob

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-10 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-03 15:36 [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: add unit converter Peter Rosin
2018-04-03 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: afe: add current-sense-cuicuit and voltage-divider Peter Rosin
2018-04-08 16:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-04-09 11:12     ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-10 13:13     ` Rob Herring
2018-04-10 13:49       ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-04-08 17:40   ` Fabio Estevam
2018-04-03 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: afe: unit-converter: new driver Peter Rosin
2018-04-08 16:55   ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-04-03 17:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: add unit converter Andrew F. Davis
2018-04-03 18:09   ` Peter Rosin
2018-04-03 18:55     ` Andrew F. Davis
2018-04-10 13:06     ` Rob Herring [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180410130652.d3kk3vo6p4524mid@rob-hp-laptop \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    --cc=preid@electromag.com.au \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox