From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] regulator: bd9571mwv: Add support for DDR backup mode Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:58:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20180420085826.4omlf2rrwuno3mtj@dell> References: <1524057484-25350-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20180420074914.vl4rer5zdeldfzb3@dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Marek Vasut , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Linux-Renesas , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> The ROHM BD9571MWV PMIC on the Renesas Salvator-X(S) and ULCB > >> development boards supports DDR Backup Power, which means that the DDR > >> power rails can be kept powered while the main SoC is powered down. > > > > Should this set be applied together, or can the MFD patches be applied > > on their own, without the Regulator patch? > > The regulator patch depends on the MFD patches, so it's best for them to > go in together. > > > If the former, then we're going to need an Ack from Mark. > > Alternative, as you've already supplied (some form of) your Ack for the firs > 3 patches, they can go in through Mark? All of it is enhancing the > regulator part. Yes, that's fine too: Acked-by: Lee Jones -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog