public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Greg
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/10] ARM: Remove support for Exynos5440
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 22:56:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180424205636.cdp4czq6hhs5gu5a@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2CZU1CYFt0fdVSFFnj2Wg=mUcC=yuWAW7zDO0u2Q2dUQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:50:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:32 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Overview
> > ========
> > Let's continue the removal of old platforms. We already get rid of Exynos4212.
> > Now it's time for Exynos5440.
> >
> > The Exynos5440 (quad-core A15 with GMAC, PCIe, SATA) was targeting
> > server platforms but it did not make it to the market really.  There are
> > no development boards with it and probably there are no real products
> > neither.  The development for Exynos5440 ended in 2013 and since then
> > the platform is in maintenance mode.
> >
> > The only development happening around it is the PCIe driver for Exynos5433
> > (ARMv8). [1]
> >
> > Removing Exynos5440, makes our life slightly easier:
> > 1. Less maintenance,
> > 2. Smaller code, less quirks,
> > 3. No need to preserve (imaginary) backward-compatibility for Exynos PCIe
> >    driver (so it is easier to add support for Exynos5433).
> >
> >
> > Because of point (3) above - I left the PCIe and PCIe PHY drivers intact.
> >
> >
> > Dependencies
> > ============
> > I think about starting with removal of DTS in some kernel release (patch 1/10).
> > Then all drivers can be removed/updated - subsystem maintainers can pick their
> > patches freely.
> >
> > Finally, after getting rid of all Exynos5440 symbols, the last patch (10/10) will
> > end in arm-soc tree.
> >
> >
> > Any comments?
> 
> I don't see any hard dependency here, if this is all unused, I think we
> can apply both patches 1 and 10 into arm-soc at the same time as merging
> the other patches through the respective subsystem trees.

The only dependency is through Kconfig symbol (SOC_EXYNOS5440).  After
applying 10/10, which removes SOC_EXYNOS5440, some automatic code
testers can complain about non-existing Kconfig option.  That's not big
issue because all this will go away so indeed we could take everything
in one release.


Best regards,
rzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-24 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-24 20:32 [RFC 00/10] ARM: Remove support for Exynos5440 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:32 ` [RFC 01/10] ARM: dts: exynos: Remove Exynos5440 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-26  4:31   ` andi
2018-05-01 14:07   ` Rob Herring
2018-05-02 17:07   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:32 ` [RFC 02/10] ata: ahci-platform: Remove support for Exynos5440 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-05-01 14:08   ` Rob Herring
2018-04-24 20:32 ` [RFC 03/10] cpufreq: exynos: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-25  2:48   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-04-26  1:05   ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-04-26  1:05   ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-05-01 14:08   ` Rob Herring
2018-04-24 20:32 ` [RFC 04/10] clk: samsung: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-25 12:49   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2018-04-26  0:58   ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-04-26  0:58   ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-05-01 22:01   ` Stephen Boyd
2018-04-24 20:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:32 ` [RFC 05/10] i2c: s3c2410: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-25 12:56   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2018-04-26  4:33   ` andi
2018-04-28 12:44   ` Wolfram Sang
2018-04-24 20:32 ` [RFC 06/10] thermal: samsung: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-25 10:42   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-04-25 13:18   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-04-26 11:21     ` [PATCH] " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-05-01 14:45       ` Rob Herring
2018-04-26  1:41   ` [RFC 06/10] " Chanwoo Choi
2018-04-26  7:59     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-26  1:41   ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-04-24 20:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:32 ` [RFC 07/10] pinctrl: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-26  1:15   ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-04-26  1:15   ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-05-02 17:09   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:32 ` [RFC 08/10] spi: s3c64xx: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-25 12:49   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2018-04-25 12:55     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-26  4:35   ` andi
2018-04-24 20:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:32 ` [RFC 09/10] usb: host: exynos: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-25 12:04   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-04-24 20:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:32 ` [RFC 10/10] ARM: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-05-02 17:07   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-04-24 20:50 ` [RFC 00/10] ARM: " Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-24 20:56   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2018-04-24 21:12     ` Arnd Bergmann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-24 20:32 Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180424205636.cdp4czq6hhs5gu5a@kozik-lap \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=andi@etezian.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox