From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johan Hovold Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] gnss: add new GNSS subsystem Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:31:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20180425103129.GO4615@localhost> References: <20180424163458.11947-1-johan@kernel.org> <20180425084819.GA13295@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180425084819.GA13295@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Johan Hovold , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Andreas Kemnade , Arnd Bergmann , "H . Nikolaus Schaller" , Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:48:19AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:34:51PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: > > This series adds a new subsystem for GNSS receivers (e.g. GPS > > receivers). > > YEAH!!!! > > Thanks so much for doing this, great work! Thanks! > > This all seems to work well-enough (e.g. with gpsd), but please let me > > know if I've overlooked something which would indeed require a TTY > > interface instead. > > > > As proof-of-concept I have implemented drivers for receivers based on > > two common GNSS chipsets (SiRFstar and u-blox), but due to lack of > > hardware these have so far only been tested using mockup devices and a > > USB-serial-based GPS device (using out-of-tree code). [ Let me know if > > you've got any evalutation kits to spare. ] > > > > Finally, note that documentation (including kerneldoc) remains to be > > written, but hopefully this will not hinder review given that the > > current interfaces are fairly self-describing. > > Is this just a RFC, or a "here's a first cut at submitting this, review > it please!" submission? I'm glad to review if you think it's worth it > at this point. It's more than just an RFC, so thanks for starting to review it. Johan