From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] edac: altera: Add support for Stratix10 SDRAM EDAC Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:08:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20180426060815.GA7931@pd.tnic> References: <1524594959-5259-1-git-send-email-thor.thayer@linux.intel.com> <1524594959-5259-3-git-send-email-thor.thayer@linux.intel.com> <2d310ff0-fa0e-e432-ae11-ba34080b4f6e@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2d310ff0-fa0e-e432-ae11-ba34080b4f6e@kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Dinh Nguyen Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, thor.thayer@linux.intel.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:14:27PM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > Does it make sense to have the support for this in separate files? No. Per vendor or per uarch/processor type, standalone EDAC drivers are fine. But not per the RAS capability of a functional unit. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.