From: Stefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@cisco.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] of: unittest: for strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 16:26:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180521232613.GA18584@sjc-ads-587.cisco.com> (raw)
For strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field:
This is consistent with how dtc builds string properties.
Function __of_prop_dup() would misbehave on such properties as it duplicates
properties based on the property length field creating new string values
without trailing \0s.
Signed-off-by: Stefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Tested-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- forgot one string in v2.
Changes in v2:
- fixed spacing around + sign.
drivers/of/unittest.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
index 6bb37c1..ecee50d 100644
--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -165,20 +165,20 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(void)
/* Add a new property - should pass*/
prop->name = "new-property";
prop->value = "new-property-data";
- prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+ prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) == 0, "Adding a new property failed\n");
/* Try to add an existing property - should fail */
prop++;
prop->name = "new-property";
prop->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
- prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+ prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) != 0,
"Adding an existing property should have failed\n");
/* Try to modify an existing property - should pass */
prop->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
- prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+ prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0,
"Updating an existing property should have passed\n");
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(void)
prop++;
prop->name = "modify-property";
prop->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
- prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+ prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0,
"Updating a missing property should have passed\n");
--
2.10.3.dirty
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-21 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-21 23:26 Stefan M Schaeckeler [this message]
2018-05-22 17:25 ` [PATCH v3] of: unittest: for strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180521232613.GA18584@sjc-ads-587.cisco.com \
--to=sschaeck@cisco.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox