From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add Kryo CPU scaling driver Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 14:07:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20180522130704.GA31065@e107155-lin> References: <1526729701-8589-1-git-send-email-ilialin@codeaurora.org> <1526988585-21678-1-git-send-email-ilialin@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1526988585-21678-1-git-send-email-ilialin@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ilia Lin Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sudeep Holla List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 02:29:45PM +0300, Ilia Lin wrote: > In Certain QCOM SoCs like apq8096 and msm8996 that have KRYO processors, > the CPU frequency subset and voltage value of each OPP varies > based on the silicon variant in use. Qualcomm Process Voltage Scaling Tables > defines the voltage and frequency value based on the msm-id in SMEM > and speedbin blown in the efuse combination. > The qcom-cpufreq-kryo driver reads the msm-id and efuse value from the SoC > to provide the OPP framework with required information. > This is used to determine the voltage and frequency value for each OPP of > operating-points-v2 table when it is parsed by the OPP framework. > > Signed-off-by: Ilia Lin > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar [...] > + > + switch (msm8996_version) { > + case MSM8996_V3: > + versions = 1 << (unsigned int)(*speedbin); > + break; > + case MSM8996_SG: > + versions = 1 << ((unsigned int)(*speedbin) + 4); > + break; > + default: > + BUG(); > + break; > + } > + > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { > + cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); > + if (NULL == cpu_dev) { > + ret = -ENODEV; > + goto free_opp; > + } > + > + opp_tables[cpu] = dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(cpu_dev, > + &versions, 1); Will be not get NULL for all CPUs except 0 ? I haven't seen the patches from Viresh yet, if that prevents getting NULL or not. -- Regards, Sudeep