From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: qcom: Introduce Hexagon V5 based WCSS driver Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 22:10:31 +0530 Message-ID: <20180605164031.GZ16230@vkoul-mobl> References: <1528177361-8883-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <20180605061919.GQ16230@vkoul-mobl> <3a4c102b-7228-153a-c588-b1bf00291fa8@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3a4c102b-7228-153a-c588-b1bf00291fa8@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sricharan R Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, sibis@codeaurora.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05-06-18, 18:26, Sricharan R wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > On 6/5/2018 11:49 AM, Vinod wrote: > > On 05-06-18, 11:12, Sricharan R wrote: > > > >> +config QCOM_Q6V5_WCSS > >> + tristate "Qualcomm Hexagon based WCSS Peripheral Image Loader" > >> + depends on OF && ARCH_QCOM > >> + depends on QCOM_SMEM > >> + depends on RPMSG_QCOM_SMD || (COMPILE_TEST && RPMSG_QCOM_SMD=n) > >> + depends on RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM || RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n > > > > Is there a reason why it depends on RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n? What would > > happen if distro wants both this and RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM > > > RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n should be for the COMPILE_TEST. Probably that why would that be a limitation? I am more worried about RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n being the condition here. In new drivers we should not typically have dependency on some symbol being not there > means that it should be corrected here and for ADSP, Q6V5_PIL as well. > Bjorn, is that correct ?, should it be, below ? > > depends on (RPMSG_QCOM_SMD || (COMPILE_TEST && RPMSG_QCOM_SMD=n)) || (RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM || (COMPILE_TEST && RPMSG_QCOM_GLINK_SMEM=n)) that doesnt really sound good :( -- ~Vinod