From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] Documentation: arm: ti: Add bindings for AM654 SoC Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:01:25 -0500 Message-ID: <20180612220125.3scgr6by62wifirp@kahuna> References: <20180605060125.9518-1-nm@ti.com> <20180605060125.9518-2-nm@ti.com> <20180612210519.GA17653@rob-hp-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180612210519.GA17653@rob-hp-laptop> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , Vignesh R , Tony Lindgren , Catalin Marinas , Santosh Shilimkar , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Tero Kristo , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 21:05-20180612, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 01:01:20AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: [...] > > +Boards based on K3 Multicore SoC architecture shall have the following property: > > +- compatible: Every hardware block introduced in K3 Multicore SoC > > + architecture shall be of the form: > > + "ti,XXX-YYY", where: > > + 'XXX' represents the specific SoC part for which the support is added. > > + 'YYY' represents the corresponding peripheral in SoC being supported. > > No need to explain standard DT convention here. (But I don't think we > have this convention documented anywhere, so patches welcome. :)) > Thanks. Will drop off from my series (will skip the generic dts convention for now ;) ). -- Regards, Nishanth Menon