From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: thermal: Add binding document for SR thermal Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:52:14 -0600 Message-ID: <20180620195214.GA10436@rob-hp-laptop> References: <1529310679-13482-1-git-send-email-srinath.mannam@broadcom.com> <1529310679-13482-2-git-send-email-srinath.mannam@broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1529310679-13482-2-git-send-email-srinath.mannam@broadcom.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Srinath Mannam Cc: Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Pramod Kumar List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 02:01:17PM +0530, Srinath Mannam wrote: > From: Pramod Kumar > > Add binding document for supported thermal implementation > in Stingray. > > Signed-off-by: Pramod Kumar > Reviewed-by: Ray Jui > Reviewed-by: Scott Branden > Reviewed-by: Srinath Mannam > --- > .../bindings/thermal/brcm,sr-thermal.txt | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/brcm,sr-thermal.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/brcm,sr-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/brcm,sr-thermal.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..33f9e11 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/brcm,sr-thermal.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ > +* Broadcom Stingray Thermal > + > +This binding describes thermal sensors that is part of Stingray SoCs. > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible : Must be "brcm,sr-thermal" > +- reg : memory where tmon data will be available. > + > +Example: > + tmons { > + compatible = "simple-bus"; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + ranges; > + > + tmon_ihost0: thermal@8f100000 { > + compatible = "brcm,sr-thermal"; > + reg = <0x8f100000 0x4>; > + }; You still haven't given me a compelling reason why you need a node per register. You have a single range of registers. Make this 1 node. Rob