From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] bus: ti-sysc: Add support for software reset Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 00:07:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20180703070743.GG112168@atomide.com> References: <20180606060826.14671-5-faiz_abbas@ti.com> <20180607073530.GH5738@atomide.com> <20180608062158.GI5738@atomide.com> <20180611060957.GN5738@atomide.com> <20180611062904.GO5738@atomide.com> <89d55b0b-fe9e-793b-2694-25755ac2bc15@ti.com> <20180611070332.GP5738@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180611070332.GP5738@atomide.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Faiz Abbas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, paul@pwsan.com, t-kristo@ti.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, bcousson@baylibre.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Tony Lindgren [180611 07:06]: > * Faiz Abbas [180611 06:48]: > > Hi, > > > > On Monday 11 June 2018 11:59 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Faiz Abbas [180611 06:28]: > > >> Great. I thought I completely misunderstood you. But I don't see what > > >> adding another function will accomplish. A QUIRK flag used in the same > > >> function would work well enough> > > > Fine with me as long as the function stays simple for both > > > syss and sysc reset. > > > > > > > > > In general a reset status bit being in sysstatus is the norm and it > > being in sysconfig should be the "quirk" for which a flag needs to be > > added. What do you think? > > Sure makes sense to me. > > > As an aside, naming bitshifts by the name of the platform they were > > originally added in seems weird. There should be some generic mask > > saying "soft reset is the 0th bit". Currently I am using > > SYSC_OMAP4_SOFTRESET for a dra76x module. I guess it depends on how many > > different sysconfig types we have. > > Sure we could have a macro for that. So what's the conclusion on this one? Are you going to do one more version of the ti-sysc driver patch? Regards, Tony