From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Brezillon Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] Add the I3C subsystem Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 12:05:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20180720120518.445b947b@bbrezillon> References: <20180719152930.3715-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> <2ab0ab75-2df0-2714-f007-c33b25481016@axentia.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2ab0ab75-2df0-2714-f007-c33b25481016@axentia.se> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Rosin Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Przemyslaw Sroka , Arkadiusz Golec , Alan Douglas , Bartosz Folta , Damian Kos , Alicja Jurasik-Urbaniak , Cyprian Wronka , Suresh Punnoose , Rafal Ciepiela , Thomas Petazzoni , Nishanth Menon , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 11:57:56 +0200 Peter Rosin wrote: > > Maybe a bit-bang I3C master isn't feasible for some fundamental > reason? No, it's clearly not. The way an I3C master is supposed to switch from open-drain to push-pull during a transaction or the concept of IBIs are the first things that come to mind, but I guess you have plenty of other reasons preventing you from implementing a i3c-bit-bang master.