From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: allwinner: h5: Add SID for H5 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:42:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20180724144218.jdvgrcqkz2kmohqx@flea> References: <20180724101522.68165-1-manu@freebsd.org> <20180724101522.68165-5-manu@freebsd.org> <20180724130004.ynaiabshexrrbvo4@flea> <20180724153432.e398bddfe63e51e8dcebfc46@bidouilliste.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="brs6vm3kqygfnudn" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180724153432.e398bddfe63e51e8dcebfc46@bidouilliste.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Emmanuel Vadot Cc: Emmanuel Vadot , mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wens@csie.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --brs6vm3kqygfnudn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:34:32PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:00:04 +0200 > Maxime Ripard wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:15:22PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > The SID controller on H5 look the same as the one present in the A64. > > > But in case we find some difference one day at a compatible string > > > of it's own and a fallback to the A64 one. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Vadot > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi | 5 +++++ > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > >=20 > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm6= 4/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > > > index 62d646baac3c..28183bf77164 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > > > @@ -129,3 +129,8 @@ > > > ; > > > compatible =3D "allwinner,sun50i-h5-pinctrl"; > > > }; > > > + > > > +&sid { > > > + compatible =3D "allwinner,sun50i-h5-sid", > > > + "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sid"; > > > +}; > >=20 > > This is still a bit pointless, please remove the common node. >=20 > You mean directly declare sid controller in the SoC dtsi and not > have a common node in sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi ? Yep --=20 Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com --brs6vm3kqygfnudn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE0VqZU19dR2zEVaqr0rTAlCFNr3QFAltXOskACgkQ0rTAlCFN r3S92A/7BqeShOU5I3OcS+OPLhKF42tICmDuPhTESquJZmySeJtbX18zY8prwi86 oYsBlOzJm4pcYCQnUJnVlLbQmraIAJfRTqdg6U5gmC39y2QoFzvKKzByoSNJOESC GLkhYfNyjz+0UGnkDo3fsS2rvn4XcPvPddDpWgZLP62kSowxbf2xOr0iD+/HcI4Z wcnLKQMa3Uuz/0czpF0FRvhakpQ8HeiiecRkfVsy6AaJEtnqVrj6CET/aR+E0wGo XnNWnSr0TNldIfsmf0SSvEeQ5q3PaScqdQ+3pgwpmVo5taA/h/0plMfGTRFlE4Ob Ofhxs7IgL9qxHkDB4r0iwxKXvEmA36Bxcropk66YgNPLi9PoNluZsyd/bmGsvst4 uvCEDyZ0MKoqvgBwmSMiv/KRcQ3fJKK4iJE1kIeCWHychG+pMV+L8S7CZOwQn05+ eSLN5lQqh1p/N0OCoEMFQlArnAun1AcUjVtJlOJhrebjZvAKFsX8Imz1i6nqOEze VtU5385ED4Xvhig9VDn8Tlb9q1CwRS/6KF/LXqNxWvPcB98Bpa/81YLefPC/VRWc 20hTdeKzMJe/Tqez7jxjp7owit3UXoPGtvebE7JSjPx6IJ/FNG0LwoQYM56dI8Dl sJJZsl6ld6szaNhwMuSktma1SMBEvYHwJjqKql8F+t4F2a5R/pg= =8aZK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --brs6vm3kqygfnudn--