From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] ASoC: wcd9335: add basic controls Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:34:07 +0530 Message-ID: <20180725120407.GO3661@vkoul-mobl> References: <20180723155410.9494-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <20180723155410.9494-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180723155410.9494-9-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Srinivas Kandagatla Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.com, bgoswami@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 23-07-18, 16:54, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > +static int wcd9335_set_compander(struct snd_kcontrol *kc, > + struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol) > +{ > + struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kc); > + struct wcd9335_codec *wcd = dev_get_drvdata(component->dev); > + int comp = ((struct soc_mixer_control *) kc->private_value)->shift; > + int value = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0]; > + int sel; > + > + wcd->comp_enabled[comp] = value; > + sel = value ? WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_COMPANDER : > + WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_REGISTER; > + > + /* Any specific register configuration for compander */ > + switch (comp) { > + case COMPANDER_1: > + /* Set Gain Source Select based on compander enable/disable */ > + snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, WCD9335_HPH_L_EN, > + WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_MASK, sel); > + break; > + case COMPANDER_2: > + snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, WCD9335_HPH_R_EN, > + WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_MASK, sel); > + break; > + case COMPANDER_3: > + break; > + case COMPANDER_4: > + break; > + case COMPANDER_5: > + snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, WCD9335_SE_LO_LO3_GAIN, > + WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_MASK, sel); > + break; > + case COMPANDER_6: > + snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, WCD9335_SE_LO_LO4_GAIN, > + WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_MASK, sel); > + break; > + case COMPANDER_7: > + break; > + case COMPANDER_8: > + break; why not do: case COMPANDER_3: case COMPANDER_4: case COMPANDER_7: case COMPANDER_8: break; thereby clubbing all the ones not handled together.. > +static int wcd9335_rx_hph_mode_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kc, > + struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol) > +{ > + struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kc); > + struct wcd9335_codec *wcd = dev_get_drvdata(component->dev); > + > + ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = wcd->hph_mode; i think this is an enum so shouldn't value.enumerated.item[0] be used? > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int wcd9335_rx_hph_mode_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kc, > + struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol) > +{ > + struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kc); > + struct wcd9335_codec *wcd = dev_get_drvdata(component->dev); > + u32 mode_val; > + > + mode_val = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]; yaaay -- ~Vinod