From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eduardo Valentin Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: thermal: samsung: Add SPDX license identifier Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 15:53:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20180727225321.GF4450@localhost.localdomain> References: <2442216.oppRSGRAaL@amdc3058> <20180724200312.xs6u4nvhjckukkig@kozik-lap> <2385592.z8yee4uxt4@amdc3058> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Zhang Rui , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Kukjin Kim , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 06:27:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 25 July 2018 at 16:43, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 10:03:12 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 06:46:35PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 10:02:50 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> > > Replace GPL license statement with SPDX license identifier (GPL-2.0+). > >> > > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > >> > > --- > >> > > include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h | 12 +----------- > >> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-) > >> > > > >> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h > >> > > index 0646500bca69..642e4e7f4084 100644 > >> > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h > >> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h > >> > > @@ -1,19 +1,9 @@ > >> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */ > >> > > >> > This code should be GPL-2.0 only, original license statement is most > >> > likely result of using wrong file as the source of copy-paste. So I > >> > would like to have the license fixed first before doing conversion to > >> > SPDX. > >> > >> If you think that's the case, then it makes sense and please go ahead. > >> As fair as I remember this required signed-off from all contributors... > >> so probably just Lukasz and Eduardo? > > > > git blame shows just Lukasz so his Ack should be enough. You probably want to have his ack yes. > > > > I'm also fine with doing it in one patch like i.e. in commit a80ea4cb944e > > ("pata_bk3710: clarify license version and use SPDX header"), if you are > > also fine with it could you please re-spin the patch (+Cc: Lukasz)? > > I do not have interest in changing the license, I do not want to deal > with possible legal issues so I'll skip it. > :-) > I am fine however with abandoning this patch if you or someone else > sends license change + SPDX. > If that is the case, I am skipping this patch. Ping me / RESEND in case you still want this. :-) > Best regards, > Krzysztof