From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] RISC-V: implement low-level interrupt handling Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 11:59:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20180802095911.GA14841@lst.de> References: <20180726143723.16585-1-hch@lst.de> <20180726143723.16585-6-hch@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , palmer@sifive.com, jason@lakedaemon.net, marc.zyngier@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, anup@brainfault.org, atish.patra@wdc.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, shorne@gmail.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > index 9aaf6c986771..fa2c08e3c05e 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > @@ -168,8 +168,8 @@ ENTRY(handle_exception) > > > > /* Handle interrupts */ > > move a0, sp /* pt_regs */ > > - REG_L a1, handle_arch_irq > > - jr a1 > > + move a1, s4 /* scause */ > > + tail do_IRQ > > What's the reason for doing the whole exception dance in ASM ? I'll let Palmer defend it. But for now I just want minimal changes to actually get a booting system..