From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt: bindings: lm3697: Add bindings for lm3697 driver
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 23:58:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180808215842.GF15831@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65e927b4-8bd2-1f34-3422-36ce21f674c3@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1138 bytes --]
Hi!
> >>> Yes, and LED strings are statically assigned to banks, right?
> >>>
> >>> So why not simply forget about LED strings for sake of hw
> >>> abstractions, and work just with banks?
> >>
> >> How would you set the control bank register for the correct LED string configuration?
> >
> > Have property at each LED saying which which HVLEDs it controls?
>
> Isn't that what I have already using the reg property?
> Then we would have to aggregate the configuration and make a determination in the driver.
Yes.
> But that does not follow the LED child node ideology.
> Each output of the LED driver should have a child node.
>
> In this case the outputs are the sinks(inputs) and there are only 2 sinks so having 3 LED child nodes would be confusing
> and there are required properties for each child like label.
No, I don't want that.
I'd like 2 child nodes, each specifying which HVLEDs it controls.
Let me edit the original proposal.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-08 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-07 16:04 [PATCH v2 1/2] dt: bindings: lm3697: Add bindings for lm3697 driver Dan Murphy
2018-08-07 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] leds: lm3697: Introduce the " Dan Murphy
2018-08-08 19:59 ` Pavel Machek
2018-08-14 13:54 ` Dan Murphy
2018-08-08 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt: bindings: lm3697: Add bindings for " Michal Vokáč
2018-08-08 9:52 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-08-08 19:59 ` Pavel Machek
2018-08-08 20:42 ` Dan Murphy
2018-08-08 21:02 ` Pavel Machek
2018-08-08 21:04 ` Dan Murphy
2018-08-08 21:09 ` Pavel Machek
2018-08-08 21:41 ` Dan Murphy
2018-08-08 21:45 ` Pavel Machek
2018-08-08 21:50 ` Dan Murphy
2018-08-08 21:58 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2018-08-08 21:09 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-08-08 21:45 ` Dan Murphy
2018-08-09 12:09 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-08-09 13:24 ` Pavel Machek
2018-08-09 13:30 ` Dan Murphy
2018-08-09 14:48 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-08-09 15:01 ` Dan Murphy
2018-08-09 21:59 ` Pavel Machek
2018-08-08 22:00 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180808215842.GF15831@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmurphy@ti.com \
--cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).