From: jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: display: atmel: optional video-interface of endpoints
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:46:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180816194651.GA30122@w540> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <061a99d5-4fe6-795c-7e91-cf7127fb8472@axentia.se>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5870 bytes --]
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 02:52:41PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-08-03 10:51, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 10:40:02AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >> On 2018-08-03 10:11, jacopo mondi wrote:
> >>> Hi Peter!
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:23:07AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >>>> With bus-type/bus-width properties in the endpoint nodes, the video-
> >>>> interface of the connection can be specified for cases where the
> >>>> heuristic fails to select the correct output mode. This can happen
> >>>> e.g. if not all RGB pins are routed on the PCB; the driver has no
> >>>> way of knowing this, and needs to be told explicitly.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is critical for the devices that have the "conflicting output
> >>>> formats" issue (SAM9N12, SAM9X5, SAMA5D3), since the most significant
> >>>> RGB bits move around depending on the selected output mode. For
> >>>> devices that do not have the "conflicting output formats" issue
> >>>> (SAMA5D2, SAMA5D4), this is completely irrelevant.
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt
> >>>> index 82f2acb3d374..9de434a8f523 100644
> >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt
> >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt
> >>>> @@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ Required children nodes:
> >>>> to external devices using the OF graph reprensentation (see ../graph.txt).
> >>>> At least one port node is required.
> >>>>
> >>>> +Optional properties in grandchild nodes:
> >>>> + Any endpoint grandchild node may specify a desired video interface
> >>>> + according to ../../media/video-interfaces.txt, specifically
> >>>> + - bus-type: must be <0>.
> >>>
> >>> Is there any value in specifying this, if it has a fixed value to
> >>> "autodetect"? I understand it's optional, so if nobody else objects,
> >>> feels free to keep it there.
> >>
> >> That's just how media/video-interfaces.txt works.
> >>
> >> bus-type 0 means that other properties describe the bus type. In this
> >> case bus-width is specified, so that means a parallel bus. But bus-width
> >> has no meaning (or may not have) if bus-type is non-zero. But checking
> >> that bus-type for zero in the code seemed like overkill to me since the
> >> driver already knows that it is a parallel bus...
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, I felt like pointing that out since you're not cheking for its value,
> > and that property is only used by v4l2-fwnode to handle some
> > not-that-used-anymore bus as CCP2 is.
> >
> >> TL;DR I'd like to keep it.
> >>
> >
> > Fine with me then.
> >
> >>>
> >>>> + - bus-width: recognized values are <12>, <16>, <18> and <24>, and
> >>>> + override any output mode selection heuristic, forcing "rgb444",
> >>>> + "rgb565", "rgb666" and "rgb888" respectively.
> >>>> +
> >>>> Example:
> >>>>
> >>>> hlcdc: hlcdc@f0030000 {
> >>>> @@ -50,3 +58,21 @@ Example:
> >>>> #pwm-cells = <3>;
> >>>> };
> >>>> };
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> Two blank lines here.
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +Example 2: With a video interface override to force rgb565; as above
> >>>> +but with these changes/additions:
> >>>> +
> >>>> + &hlcdc {
> >>>> + hlcdc-display-controller {
> >>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lcd_base &pinctrl_lcd_rgb565>;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + port@0 {
> >>>
> >>> The node has a unit address specified, you're missing a reg = <0>
> >>> property (no big deal, it's an example, but the other one has it)
> >>>
> >>>> + hlcdc_panel_output: endpoint@0 {
> >>>
> >>> Missing reg here too.
> >>
> >> I'll fix those (I think they appeared for the original example after I
> >> wrote the patch).
> >>
> >
> > Ok, then please consider also describing the port@0 node cell sizes too
> > since it has a child endpoint node.
>
> Ok, I have now figured out why this was as it were, and I no longer agree
> with adding the extra properties. The whole of example 2 is inside a
> reference (using the &hlcdc notation) to the hlcdc node in example 1, and
> therefore these "missing" properties are not missing. I think they are
> just clutter that hides what is really needed/different between example 1
> and 2, and apparently Boris and Rob agreed when they acked/reviewed. The
> description of example 2 also clearly states that example 2 is changes
> and additions on top of example 1. So, I plan to have this in the next
> iteration:
>
> &hlcdc {
> hlcdc-display-controller {
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lcd_base &pinctrl_lcd_rgb565>;
>
> port@0 {
> hlcdc_panel_output: endpoint@0 {
> bus-width = <16>;
Right, I thought that even when re-defining a node, reg properties
should be there, but yes, I had no reasons to think so :)
> };
> };
> };
> };
>
> Jacopo, please let me know if you want me to keep your review tag anyway...
>
Sure
>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Peter
> >>
> >>> Minors apart:
>
> ...because I interpret this to mean that I could add your tag if I made the
> changes you suggested. Or did it mean that I could add your tag regardless
> because the issues were minor?
>v
Sorry, I was not clear. That was a minor nit, you could have add my
tag anyhow.
Thanks
j
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> j
> >>>
> >>>> + bus-type = <0>;
> >>>> + bus-width = <16>;
> >>>> + };
> >>>> + };
> >>>> + };
> >>>> + };
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.11.0
> >>>>
> >>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-16 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-03 7:23 [RESEND PATCH v5 0/3] drm/atmel-hlcdc: bus-width override support Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 7:23 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-transmitter: add ti,ds90c185 Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 7:23 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: display: atmel: optional video-interface of endpoints Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 8:11 ` jacopo mondi
2018-08-03 8:40 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 8:51 ` jacopo mondi
2018-08-16 12:52 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-16 19:46 ` jacopo mondi [this message]
2018-08-03 8:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-08-03 7:23 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 3/3] drm/atmel-hlcdc: support bus-width (12/16/18/24) in endpoint nodes Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 8:17 ` jacopo mondi
2018-08-03 8:25 ` Peter Rosin
2018-08-03 7:30 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 0/3] drm/atmel-hlcdc: bus-width override support Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180816194651.GA30122@w540 \
--to=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org \
--cc=jsarha@ti.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).